[Thu Jun 13 10:25:33 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (311.6, 480.5) = 17 3 17.15 78 39 29.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 167.8 +/- 22.6
  Background counts = 100.1
  Rate = 0.008 +/- 0.001

[Thu Jun 13 10:25:33 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.24'
[Thu Jun 13 10:34:07 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.05 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 13 10:34:07 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Thu Jun 13 10:34:07 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.05"
[Thu Jun 13 10:34:07 2013] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.000
[Thu Jun 13 10:34:07 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 13.05"
[Thu Jun 13 11:49:27 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 11:49:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 13 11:49:27 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 11:49:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 13 11:49:27 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 13 11:49:28 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 11:49:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 13 11:49:28 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 11:49:28 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 13 11:49:28 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 635.567000, observed total counts = 577.000000
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 10
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 789.413000, observed total counts = 756.000000
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 2.162934 pixels
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 4 to 7
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] 743.772000 total counts/ 399.769000 bgd. counts: snr = 17.205119
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 2.162934 pixels
  Position = (311.3, 478.4) = 17 3 17.61 78 39 21.9
  Extent = 25.7 (25.6-25.7)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 344.0 +/- 27.3
  Background counts = 399.8
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.003
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Source 10 is offset by -0.488414 and 1.480041 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.475977 x 1.475977, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Source is confused with source 7
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Source is confused with source 2
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Source is confused with source 4
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Source is confused with source 3
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Source is confused with source 6
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Source is confused with source 18
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Source is confused with source 12
[Thu Jun 13 13:40:21 2013] Source is confused with source 14
[Thu Jun 13 13:44:38 2013] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 13 13:44:38 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Thu Jun 13 13:44:38 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 25.70"
[Thu Jun 13 13:44:38 2013] source mask rpix=5.9, npix_max = 164, mask sum = 157, frac = 0.956
[Thu Jun 13 13:44:38 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 25.70"
[Thu Jun 13 14:58:33 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 14:58:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Thu Jun 13 14:58:33 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 14:58:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Thu Jun 13 14:58:33 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 13 14:58:33 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 14:58:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Thu Jun 13 14:58:33 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 14:58:33 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Thu Jun 13 14:58:33 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 13 16:43:52 2013] Warning, spatial fit 3 centroid is now closest to src. 3
[Thu Jun 13 16:43:52 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 584.710000, observed total counts = 453.000000
[Thu Jun 13 16:43:52 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 10
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 13 16:43:52 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 806.825000, observed total counts = 795.000000
[Thu Jun 13 16:43:52 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 1.606931 pixels
[Thu Jun 13 16:43:52 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 3 to 17
[Thu Jun 13 16:43:52 2013] 780.356950 total counts/ 775.940000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.158565
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 10 = 1.606931 pixels
  Position = (310.1, 477.3) = 17 3 19.41 78 39 17.4
  Extent = 3.2 (3.1-3.3)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 4.4 +/- 27.9
  Background counts = 775.9
  Rate = 0.0005 +/- 0.003
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability