[Tue Jul 31 12:49:53 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (205.3, 379.0) = 9 9 19.61 -9 41 41.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 100.0 +/- 16.7
  Background counts = 93.9
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Tue Jul 31 12:49:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.93'
[Tue Jul 31 16:12:34 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 31 16:12:34 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.89"
[Tue Jul 31 16:12:34 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.831
[Tue Jul 31 16:12:34 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 10.89"
[Tue Jul 31 18:46:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 18:46:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Tue Jul 31 18:46:42 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 18:46:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Tue Jul 31 18:46:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 31 18:46:43 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 18:46:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue Jul 31 18:46:43 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 31 18:46:43 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue Jul 31 18:46:43 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 31 21:17:46 2012] Source 17 is offset by 2.865138 and 3.803670 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 7.466897 x 1.326860, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul 31 21:17:46 2012] Warning, spatial fit 23 centroid is now closest to src. 10
[Tue Jul 31 21:17:46 2012] Source 17 is offset by 0.161660 and 1.396222 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.230874 x 1.230874, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jul 31 21:17:46 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 31 21:17:46 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 31 21:17:46 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 31 21:17:46 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 31 21:17:46 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 31 21:17:46 2012] Source is confused with source 12
[Tue Jul 31 23:33:15 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.89 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 31 23:33:15 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.89"
[Tue Jul 31 23:33:15 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.831
[Tue Jul 31 23:33:15 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 10.89"
[Wed Aug  1 01:11:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Wed Aug  1 01:11:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Wed Aug  1 01:11:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug  1 01:11:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Wed Aug  1 01:11:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug  1 01:11:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Wed Aug  1 01:11:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Wed Aug  1 01:11:36 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Wed Aug  1 01:11:36 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Wed Aug  1 01:11:36 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Aug  1 03:07:06 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1291.080000, observed total counts = 1448.000000
[Wed Aug  1 03:07:06 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 17
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Aug  1 03:07:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Aug  1 03:07:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Aug  1 03:07:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Aug  1 03:07:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Aug  1 03:07:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Aug  1 03:55:00 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(17814.257004, 32927.245300, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Wed Aug  1 03:55:00 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17_src.reg
[Wed Aug  1 03:55:00 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (168, 342) - (243, 417)
[Wed Aug  1 03:55:00 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(17814.257004, 32927.245300, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18637.691600, 33627.254800, 1716.136049, 1716.136049, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18185.536301, 30896.033722, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18788.084579, 33937.701660, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18480.833969, 33269.011292, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19503.324249, 31178.188995, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19668.887894, 32840.797546, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19791.462631, 33272.983215, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16871.197235, 34857.016174, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17560.217163, 33440.226166, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18018.605316, 33717.087311, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16427.610870, 34587.769653, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16625.645400, 35013.478600, 1404.688040, 1404.688040, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17131.379486, 33367.287201, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(15796.636000, 34201.440000, 1885.512054, 1885.512054, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17866.842514, 34240.823700, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17137.667923, 32754.097565, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17201.241272, 33871.891449, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16758.842000, 33884.636000, 1796.512052, 1796.512052, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17741.761429, 34595.344452, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Wed Aug  1 03:55:00 2012] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17.gif
[Wed Aug  1 04:02:35 2012] Mean detx,y = (7584.19, -7246.19) 
[Wed Aug  1 04:02:36 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Wed Aug  1 04:02:53 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Wed Aug  1 04:02:53 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17_src_b10.pi.gz
[Wed Aug  1 04:02:53 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17_bgd.pi.gz
[Wed Aug  1 04:19:03 2012] Not generating rmf since there are only 99 counts
[Wed Aug  1 04:19:03 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Wed Aug  1 04:49:43 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Wed Aug  1 04:49:43 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17_src_b10.pi.gz
[Wed Aug  1 04:49:43 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Wed Aug  1 04:49:43 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00615, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0112950401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src17.arf
[Wed Aug  1 04:49:43 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Wed Aug  1 04:49:44 2012] Updating source flux to 1.6e-13
[Wed Aug  1 04:49:46 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting