[Fri Aug 24 10:14:03 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (387.6, 373.1) = 9 8 35.78 -9 28 4.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 76.1 +/- 11.8
  Background counts = 23.5
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Fri Aug 24 10:14:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.43'
[Fri Aug 24 10:17:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 24 10:17:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.64"
[Fri Aug 24 10:17:51 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.921
[Fri Aug 24 10:17:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 10.64"
[Fri Aug 24 13:05:21 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 24 13:05:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Fri Aug 24 13:05:21 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 24 13:05:21 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Fri Aug 24 13:05:21 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 24 13:05:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 24 13:05:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Fri Aug 24 13:05:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 24 13:05:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Fri Aug 24 13:05:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 24 18:03:55 2012] Warning: source 6 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 8 at 16.084952 pixels away
[Fri Aug 24 18:03:55 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Aug 24 18:03:55 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Aug 24 18:03:55 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Aug 24 18:03:55 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Aug 24 18:03:55 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Aug 24 18:04:29 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Aug 24 18:04:29 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.64"
[Fri Aug 24 18:04:29 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.921
[Fri Aug 24 18:04:29 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 10.64"
[Fri Aug 24 20:01:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 24 20:01:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Fri Aug 24 20:01:39 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 24 20:01:39 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Fri Aug 24 20:01:39 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Aug 24 20:01:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 24 20:01:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Fri Aug 24 20:01:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Fri Aug 24 20:01:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Fri Aug 24 20:01:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112950301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 25 00:35:12 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 282.842000, observed total counts = 239.000000
[Sat Aug 25 00:35:12 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 8
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sat Aug 25 00:35:12 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 25 00:35:12 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 25 00:35:12 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 25 00:35:12 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 25 00:35:12 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Aug 25 00:35:12 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9