[Fri May  3 01:23:17 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (476.1, 412.8) = 0 50 16.73 -74 31 20.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 82.0 +/- 11.7
  Background counts = 7.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Fri May  3 01:23:18 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.32'
[Fri May  3 04:38:07 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  3 04:38:07 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri May  3 04:38:07 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.09"
[Fri May  3 04:38:07 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 60, frac = 1.073
[Fri May  3 04:38:07 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 0, mean size = 14.09"
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.csv
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 185.334000, observed total counts = 160.000000
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 3
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.09 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.09"
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 60, frac = 1.073
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 14.09"
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.csv
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 08:14:04 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 185.332000, observed total counts = 160.000000
[Fri May  3 08:14:04 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 3
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri May  3 08:14:04 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May  3 08:14:04 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May  3 08:14:04 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May  3 08:14:04 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May  3 08:14:04 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May  3 08:14:04 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9