[Fri May  3 01:23:17 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (330.1, 299.9) = 0 52 55.04 -74 39 32.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 66.9 +/- 15.9
  Background counts = 14.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Fri May  3 01:23:18 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.30'
[Fri May  3 04:38:07 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.58 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  3 04:38:07 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.58"
[Fri May  3 04:38:07 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.746
[Fri May  3 04:38:07 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 0, mean size = 7.58"
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.csv
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Fri May  3 05:34:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Warning, spatial fit 16 centroid is now closest to src. 24
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1242.230000, observed total counts = 964.000000
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 25
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May  3 05:34:32 2013] Source is confused with source 29
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.58 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.58"
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 15, frac = 0.746
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 12 for pass 1, mean size = 7.58"
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.csv
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.csv
[Fri May  3 08:13:50 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src12.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 08:14:04 2013] Source 25 is offset by -6.847267 and -0.713823 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.871071 x 0.871071, not incorporating fit results
[Fri May  3 08:14:04 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May  3 08:14:04 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May  3 08:14:04 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May  3 08:14:04 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May  3 08:14:04 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May  3 08:14:04 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9