[Fri May  3 01:22:49 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (475.8, 412.9) = 0 50 17.01 -74 31 17.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 64.6 +/- 10.6
  Background counts = 7.6
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0003

[Fri May  3 01:22:50 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.30'
[Fri May  3 04:01:23 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.08 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  3 04:01:23 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri May  3 04:01:23 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.08"
[Fri May  3 04:01:23 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.146
[Fri May  3 04:01:23 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 14.08"
[Fri May  3 04:38:06 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 04:38:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Fri May  3 04:38:06 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 04:38:06 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv
[Fri May  3 04:38:06 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 04:38:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 04:38:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Fri May  3 04:38:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 04:38:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Fri May  3 04:38:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 05:34:26 2013] Warning: source 14 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 5 at 18.434439 pixels away
[Fri May  3 05:34:26 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May  3 05:34:26 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May  3 05:34:26 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May  3 05:34:26 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May  3 05:34:26 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May  3 07:39:41 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.08 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May  3 07:39:41 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Fri May  3 07:39:41 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.08"
[Fri May  3 07:39:41 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 55, mask sum = 64, frac = 1.146
[Fri May  3 07:39:41 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 11 for pass 1, mean size = 14.08"
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src11 appears to have run properly
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg exists
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.csv
[Fri May  3 07:50:48 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112880901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src11.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May  3 08:14:01 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 172.131000, observed total counts = 157.000000
[Fri May  3 08:14:01 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.228208 pixels
[Fri May  3 08:14:01 2013] 173.482200 total counts/ 127.927000 bgd. counts: snr = 4.027698
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 5 = 0.228208 pixels
  Position = (475.8, 412.6) = 0 50 17.05 -74 31 19.1
  Extent = 10.6 (6.4-16.3)" x 3.6 (3.5-5.3)", rotation angle = 51 (32-68) degrees
  Source counts = 45.6 +/- 13.2
  Background counts = 127.9
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003
[Fri May  3 08:14:01 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May  3 08:14:01 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May  3 08:14:01 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Fri May  3 08:14:01 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May  3 08:14:01 2013] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 1.21
[Fri May  3 08:14:01 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9