[Sun Jun 24 09:39:21 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (199.1, 261.1) = 7 35 9.21 31 51 6.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 76.3 +/- 13.0
  Background counts = 37.2
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Sun Jun 24 09:39:21 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 7.70'
[Sun Jun 24 09:43:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.28 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 24 09:43:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.28"
[Sun Jun 24 09:43:23 2012] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 32, mask sum = 32, frac = 0.976
[Sun Jun 24 09:43:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 89 for pass 0, mean size = 10.28"
[Sun Jun 24 14:56:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112880801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 24 14:56:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112880801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Sun Jun 24 14:56:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112880801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 24 14:56:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112880801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.csv
[Sun Jun 24 14:56:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112880801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112880801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 24 14:56:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112880801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 24 14:56:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112880801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Sun Jun 24 14:56:32 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112880801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 24 14:56:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112880801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.csv
[Sun Jun 24 14:56:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112880801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112880801_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src89.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 24 17:42:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 497.690000, observed total counts = 328.000000
[Sun Jun 24 17:42:32 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 91
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 24 17:42:32 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 24 17:42:32 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 24 17:42:32 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 24 17:42:32 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 24 17:42:32 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun 24 17:42:32 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9