[Thu Jun 20 07:18:14 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (327.4, 314.8) = 3 8 5.96 40 57 19.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 1457.5 +/- 65.3
  Background counts = 43.2
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.001

[Thu Jun 20 07:18:20 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.41'
[Thu Jun 20 07:19:24 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 20 07:19:24 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.64"
[Thu Jun 20 07:19:24 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.836
[Thu Jun 20 07:19:24 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 7.64"
[Thu Jun 20 07:19:25 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 20 07:19:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 20 07:19:25 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 20 07:19:25 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 20 07:19:25 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 20 07:19:27 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 20 07:19:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 20 07:19:27 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 20 07:19:27 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 20 07:19:27 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:26 2013] Source 6 is offset by 8.359343 and 0.250371 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.940271 x 5.331119, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:26 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 51925.600000, observed total counts = 61092.000000
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:26 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 6
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:26 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:26 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:26 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:26 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:26 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:26 2013] Source is confused with source 3
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:56 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.64 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:56 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.64"
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:56 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 17, frac = 0.836
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:56 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 7.64"
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:56 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:56 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:56 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:57 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 20 07:20:57 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0112880701_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4 appears to have run properly
[Thu Jun 20 07:21:38 2013] Source 6 is offset by 8.359343 and -0.189893 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.881678 x 3.881678, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jun 20 07:21:38 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 56313.600000, observed total counts = 61092.000000
[Thu Jun 20 07:21:38 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 6 = 3.249547 pixels
[Thu Jun 20 07:21:38 2013] 21829.186200 total counts/ 21787.300000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.283772
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 6 = 3.249547 pixels
  Position = (329.1, 317.6) = 3 8 5.33 40 57 30.1
  Extent = 15.3 (15.3-15.3)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 41.9 +/- 147.7
  Background counts = 21787.3
  Rate = 0.0008 +/- 0.003
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability