[Wed Jul 18 06:40:03 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (328.2, 290.5) = 8 57 29.17 -41 49 55.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 81.0 +/- 17.6
  Background counts = 115.1
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0006

[Wed Jul 18 06:40:03 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.24'
[Wed Jul 18 06:43:20 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.55 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jul 18 06:43:20 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.55"
[Wed Jul 18 06:43:20 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.951
[Wed Jul 18 06:43:20 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 45 for pass 0, mean size = 7.55"
[Wed Jul 18 10:19:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 18 10:19:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.csv
[Wed Jul 18 10:19:57 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 18 10:19:57 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.csv
[Wed Jul 18 10:19:57 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src45.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 18 10:19:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 18 10:19:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.csv
[Wed Jul 18 10:19:59 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 18 10:19:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.csv
[Wed Jul 18 10:19:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src45.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 18 19:02:03 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1776.360000, observed total counts = 1114.000000
[Wed Jul 18 19:02:03 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 45
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jul 18 19:02:03 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jul 18 19:02:03 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jul 18 19:02:03 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jul 18 19:02:03 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jul 18 19:02:03 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jul 18 19:02:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.55 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jul 18 19:02:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.55"
[Wed Jul 18 19:02:51 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.951
[Wed Jul 18 19:02:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 32 for pass 1, mean size = 7.55"
[Wed Jul 18 22:23:02 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 18 22:23:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32.csv
[Wed Jul 18 22:23:02 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 18 22:23:02 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32.csv
[Wed Jul 18 22:23:02 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src32.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jul 18 22:23:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 18 22:23:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32.csv
[Wed Jul 18 22:23:03 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jul 18 22:23:03 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32.csv
[Wed Jul 18 22:23:03 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112870101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src32.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jul 19 04:52:30 2012] Source 45 is offset by 5.677248 and 5.590557 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.870920 x 0.870920, not incorporating fit results
[Thu Jul 19 04:52:30 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jul 19 04:52:30 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jul 19 04:52:30 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jul 19 04:52:30 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jul 19 04:52:30 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jul 19 04:52:30 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9