[Tue Apr 10 16:40:13 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (253.8, 89.1) = 13 30 7.37 46 58 20.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 19.7 +/- 5.6
  Background counts = 3.8
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Tue Apr 10 16:40:13 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.52'
[Tue Apr 10 16:40:55 2012] Using EEF radius (= 14.19 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Apr 10 16:40:55 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.19"
[Tue Apr 10 16:40:55 2012] source mask rpix=3.3, npix_max = 56, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.636
[Tue Apr 10 16:40:55 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 62 for pass 0, mean size = 14.19"
[Tue Apr 10 16:40:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112840201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:40:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112840201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:40:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112840201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:40:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112840201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:40:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112840201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112840201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 16:40:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112840201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:40:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112840201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:40:56 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112840201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 16:40:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112840201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.csv
[Tue Apr 10 16:40:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112840201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112840201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 16:41:12 2012] Warning, spatial fit 19 centroid is now closest to src. 18
[Tue Apr 10 16:41:12 2012] Warning, spatial fit 69 centroid is now closest to src. 37
[Tue Apr 10 16:41:12 2012] Warning, spatial fit 76 centroid is now closest to src. 76
[Tue Apr 10 16:41:19 2012] Warning, spatial fit 28 centroid is now closest to src. 4
[Tue Apr 10 16:41:19 2012] Warning: source 62 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 62 at 18.927124 pixels away
[Tue Apr 10 16:41:19 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Apr 10 16:41:19 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Apr 10 16:41:19 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Apr 10 16:41:19 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Apr 10 16:41:19 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Apr 10 16:41:19 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9