[Sat May 26 06:43:05 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (306.1, 291.8) = 9 47 36.59 -30 55 38.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 108.7 +/- 17.1
  Background counts = 14.3
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0007

[Sat May 26 06:43:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 0.73'
[Sat May 26 09:05:33 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 26 09:05:33 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.79"
[Sat May 26 09:05:33 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.941
[Sat May 26 09:05:33 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 8 for pass 0, mean size = 6.79"
[Sat May 26 09:48:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg exists
[Sat May 26 09:48:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Sat May 26 09:48:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 26 09:48:17 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.csv
[Sat May 26 09:48:17 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src8.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 26 09:48:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8.ximg exists
[Sat May 26 09:48:17 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 26 09:48:17 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src8 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 26 09:48:33 2012] Warning, spatial fit 8 centroid is now closest to src. 12
[Sat May 26 09:48:33 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 26 09:48:33 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 26 09:48:33 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 26 09:48:33 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 26 09:48:33 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 26 12:32:46 2012] Using EEF radius (= 6.79 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat May 26 12:32:46 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 6.79"
[Sat May 26 12:32:46 2012] source mask rpix=1.6, npix_max = 17, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.941
[Sat May 26 12:32:46 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 7 for pass 1, mean size = 6.79"
[Sat May 26 13:29:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg exists
[Sat May 26 13:29:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Sat May 26 13:29:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 26 13:29:13 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.csv
[Sat May 26 13:29:13 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src7.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 26 13:29:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7.ximg exists
[Sat May 26 13:29:13 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7_1.ximg exists
[Sat May 26 13:29:13 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src7 appears to have run properly
[Sat May 26 13:29:22 2012] Source 10 is offset by -3.363550 and 8.149590 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 5.040506 x 5.040506, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 26 13:29:22 2012] Source 10 is offset by 3.258151 and 5.084119 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.405936 x 2.405936, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 26 13:29:22 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 26 13:29:22 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 26 13:29:22 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 26 13:29:22 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 26 13:29:22 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 26 13:29:22 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9