[Sat Jun 16 21:00:32 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (286.1, 372.3) = 12 10 35.16 39 31 23.3 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 423.5 +/- 26.3 Background counts = 59.8 Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.0009 [Sat Jun 16 21:00:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.43' [Sat Jun 16 21:06:03 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 16 21:06:03 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.14" [Sat Jun 16 21:06:03 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.775 [Sat Jun 16 21:06:03 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 43 for pass 0, mean size = 9.14" [Sun Jun 17 02:17:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.ximg exists [Sun Jun 17 02:17:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.csv [Sun Jun 17 02:17:05 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 17 02:17:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.csv [Sun Jun 17 02:17:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 17 02:17:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.ximg exists [Sun Jun 17 02:17:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.csv [Sun Jun 17 02:17:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 17 02:17:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.csv [Sun Jun 17 02:17:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src43.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1391.480000, observed total counts = 1194.000000 [Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 45 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jun 17 06:08:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.14 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 17 06:08:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.14" [Sun Jun 17 06:08:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.775 [Sun Jun 17 06:08:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 36 for pass 1, mean size = 9.14" [Sun Jun 17 10:00:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36.ximg exists [Sun Jun 17 10:00:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36.csv [Sun Jun 17 10:00:15 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 17 10:00:15 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36.csv [Sun Jun 17 10:00:15 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src36.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 17 10:00:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36.ximg exists [Sun Jun 17 10:00:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36.csv [Sun Jun 17 10:00:18 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 17 10:00:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36.csv [Sun Jun 17 10:00:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src36.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 17 13:02:56 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1893.520000, observed total counts = 1454.000000 [Sun Jun 17 13:02:56 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 45 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sun Jun 17 13:02:56 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1396.590000, observed total counts = 1194.000000 [Sun Jun 17 13:02:56 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 45 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sun Jun 17 13:02:56 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 17 13:02:56 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 17 13:02:56 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jun 17 13:02:56 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 17 13:02:56 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jun 17 13:03:36 2012] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(24841.374817, 32342.278625, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun Jun 17 13:03:36 2012] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src45_src.reg [Sun Jun 17 13:03:36 2012] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (249, 335) - (324, 410) [Sun Jun 17 13:03:36 2012] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(24841.374817, 32342.278625, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26772.075400, 29650.521600, 1427.923241, 1427.923241, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24396.413147, 35362.939972, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20933.111063, 34546.902508, 2963.392085, 482.107777, 67.063842, X, Y) && !ellipse(21131.162000, 34148.394000, 1536.464044, 1536.464044, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24928.364197, 34143.458466, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25184.274506, 33450.580780, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21488.252000, 33059.900000, 1545.432044, 1545.432044, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21522.548974, 33134.066141, 1502.888043, 416.316949, 66.860772, X, Y) && !ellipse(25367.054688, 33009.054718, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25612.862610, 32487.460938, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21688.470000, 32617.768000, 1348.568039, 1348.568039, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21942.772080, 32122.418260, 1514.064044, 401.991212, 66.962000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25841.009277, 31879.942444, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26045.685486, 31349.302979, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24268.608002, 31550.676331, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22278.650000, 31206.074000, 1435.440041, 604.170417, 50.142000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27248.113739, 30563.316071, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22732.868000, 30095.256000, 1342.680039, 1173.664034, 90.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23799.791620, 30470.646520, 461.103213, 461.103213, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25569.546000, 29299.470000, 1363.160039, 1286.000037, 79.523000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23074.000000, 29292.606000, 1281.728037, 1281.728037, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23217.763800, 29107.874000, 1282.344037, 560.336016, 90.000000, X, Y) [Sun Jun 17 13:03:36 2012] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src45.gif [Sun Jun 17 14:43:58 2012] Mean detx,y = (-2670.91, 7780.20) [Sun Jun 17 14:44:03 2012] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sun Jun 17 14:44:27 2012] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sun Jun 17 14:44:27 2012] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src45_src_b10.pi.gz [Sun Jun 17 14:44:27 2012] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src45_bgd.pi.gz [Sun Jun 17 18:04:50 2012] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Sun Jun 17 18:04:50 2012] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sun Jun 17 22:37:09 2012] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sun Jun 17 22:37:09 2012] Error reading totcts from fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src45_src_b10.pi.gz [Sun Jun 17 22:37:11 2012] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Sun Jun 17 22:37:11 2012] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0138, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src45.arf [Sun Jun 17 22:37:11 2012] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Sun Jun 17 22:37:11 2012] Updating source flux to 8.9e-14 [Sun Jun 17 22:41:32 2012] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting