[Sat Jun 16 21:00:33 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (443.6, 248.0) = 12 9 36.07 39 22 16.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 52.3 +/- 11.6
  Background counts = 34.2
  Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0002

[Sat Jun 16 21:00:33 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.14'
[Sat Jun 16 21:06:03 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.00 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Jun 16 21:06:03 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.00"
[Sat Jun 16 21:06:03 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 30, frac = 0.706
[Sat Jun 16 21:06:03 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 99 for pass 0, mean size = 12.00"
[Sun Jun 17 02:17:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 02:17:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.csv
[Sun Jun 17 02:17:06 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 02:17:06 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.csv
[Sun Jun 17 02:17:06 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src99.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 17 02:17:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 02:17:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.csv
[Sun Jun 17 02:17:07 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 02:17:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.csv
[Sun Jun 17 02:17:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src99.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Source 102 is offset by -6.226884 and 0.311601 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.404910 x 1.404910, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1052.420000, observed total counts = 921.000000
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 102
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:18 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8