[Sat Jun 16 21:01:55 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (342.9, 219.4) = 12 10 13.85 39 20 14.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 45.3 +/- 9.3 Background counts = 19.0 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002 [Sat Jun 16 21:01:55 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.58' [Sun Jun 17 04:13:59 2012] Using EEF radius (= 9.72 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 17 04:13:59 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.72" [Sun Jun 17 04:13:59 2012] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 22, frac = 0.736 [Sun Jun 17 04:13:59 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 62 for pass 0, mean size = 9.72" [Sun Jun 17 06:08:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62.ximg exists [Sun Jun 17 06:08:00 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 17 06:08:00 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src62 appears to have run properly [Sun Jun 17 06:08:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.ximg exists [Sun Jun 17 06:08:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.csv [Sun Jun 17 06:08:01 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 17 06:08:01 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.csv [Sun Jun 17 06:08:01 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 17 06:08:35 2012] Warning: source 62 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 65 at 13.145505 pixels away [Sun Jun 17 06:08:35 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 17 06:08:35 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 17 06:08:35 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jun 17 06:08:35 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 17 06:08:35 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jun 17 06:08:35 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9