[Sat Jun 16 21:01:13 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (368.5, 456.7) = 12 10 4.14 39 37 29.5
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 40.9 +/- 8.6
  Background counts = 10.0
  Rate = 0.0007 +/- 0.0001

[Sat Jun 16 21:01:14 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.55'
[Sun Jun 17 02:17:07 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.70 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 17 02:17:07 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.70"
[Sun Jun 17 02:17:07 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 43, frac = 0.919
[Sun Jun 17 02:17:07 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 75 for pass 0, mean size = 12.70"
[Sun Jun 17 04:13:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src75.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 04:13:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src75_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 04:13:58 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src75 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jun 17 04:13:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src75.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 04:13:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src75.csv
[Sun Jun 17 04:13:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src75_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 04:13:59 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src75.csv
[Sun Jun 17 04:13:59 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src75_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src75.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:26 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 108.437000, observed total counts = 111.000000
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:26 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 2.155552 pixels
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:26 2012] 100.397100 total counts/ 47.615400 bgd. counts: snr = 7.649088
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 14 = 2.155552 pixels
  Position = (366.5, 457.4) = 12 10 4.90 39 37 33.0
  Extent = 14.2 (10.6-19.8)" x 3.6 (3.0-6.2)", rotation angle = 209 (203-217) degrees
  Source counts = 52.8 +/- 10.0
  Background counts = 47.6
  Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0002
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 1.70
[Sun Jun 17 06:08:26 2012] Source is asymmetric
[Sun Jun 17 10:00:19 2012] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun 17 10:00:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.91"
[Sun Jun 17 10:00:19 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 25, mask sum = 24, frac = 0.924
[Sun Jun 17 10:00:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 54 for pass 1, mean size = 8.91"
[Sun Jun 17 11:30:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 11:30:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54.csv
[Sun Jun 17 11:30:51 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 11:30:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54.csv
[Sun Jun 17 11:30:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src54.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 17 11:30:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 11:30:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.csv
[Sun Jun 17 11:30:52 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun 17 11:30:52 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.csv
[Sun Jun 17 11:30:52 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112830201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src54.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun 17 13:03:05 2012] Warning, spatial fit 54 centroid is now closest to src. 18
[Sun Jun 17 13:03:05 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun 17 13:03:05 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun 17 13:03:05 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Jun 17 13:03:05 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun 17 13:03:05 2012] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 1.70
[Sun Jun 17 13:03:05 2012] Source is asymmetric
[Sun Jun 17 13:03:05 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9