[Tue Mar 20 06:35:13 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (282.3, 273.9) = 12 29 9.62 2 2 57.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 167.0 +/- 23.7
  Background counts = 10.5
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.006

[Tue Mar 20 06:35:13 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.13'
[Tue Mar 20 07:13:23 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 20 07:13:23 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.49"
[Tue Mar 20 07:13:23 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 10, frac = 0.506
[Tue Mar 20 07:13:23 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 0, mean size = 7.49"
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.csv
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:26 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:26 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:26 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:32 2012] Warning: source 3 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 16.389763 pixels away
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:32 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:32 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:32 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:32 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:32 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 20 07:35:32 2012] Source is confused with source 1
[Tue Mar 20 07:56:13 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Mar 20 07:56:13 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.49"
[Tue Mar 20 07:56:13 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 10, frac = 0.506
[Tue Mar 20 07:56:13 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 3 for pass 1, mean size = 7.49"
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.csv
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg exists
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.csv
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112770101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src3.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:28 2012] Source 6 is offset by -6.563593 and -2.136542 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 2.846777 x 3.522501, not incorporating fit results
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:28 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:28 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:28 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:28 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:28 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Mar 20 08:11:28 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9