[Sun Aug 26 10:19:19 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (417.8, 431.1) = 8 8 46.80 -47 11 50.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 689.7 +/- 32.6
  Background counts = 30.2
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.001

[Sun Aug 26 10:19:24 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.94'
[Sun Aug 26 10:23:17 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Aug 26 10:23:17 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.90"
[Sun Aug 26 10:23:17 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.020
[Sun Aug 26 10:23:17 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 12.90"
[Sun Aug 26 13:36:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 26 13:36:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun Aug 26 13:36:22 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 26 13:36:22 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Sun Aug 26 13:36:22 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 26 13:36:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 26 13:36:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Aug 26 13:36:24 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Sun Aug 26 13:36:24 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Sun Aug 26 13:36:24 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112670501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Aug 26 16:14:17 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 45
[Sun Aug 26 16:14:18 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 699.708000, observed total counts = 696.000000
[Sun Aug 26 16:14:18 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.468392 pixels
[Sun Aug 26 16:14:18 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 9 to 41
[Sun Aug 26 16:14:18 2012] 690.419300 total counts/ 631.653000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.338240
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.468392 pixels
  Position = (417.3, 430.9) = 8 8 46.99 -47 11 52.3
  Extent = 5.8 (4.0-9.9)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 58.8 +/- 26.3
  Background counts = 631.7
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0009
[Sun Aug 26 16:14:18 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Aug 26 16:14:18 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Aug 26 16:14:18 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Sun Aug 26 16:14:18 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Aug 26 16:14:18 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Aug 26 16:14:18 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9