[Thu Jun 13 19:25:08 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (325.4, 433.9) = 5 41 39.46 -1 46 3.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 136.3 +/- 17.4
  Background counts = 52.8
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0006

[Thu Jun 13 19:25:10 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.01'
[Thu Jun 13 19:28:25 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun 13 19:28:25 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.44"
[Thu Jun 13 19:28:25 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.073
[Thu Jun 13 19:28:25 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 11.44"
[Thu Jun 13 22:01:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 22:01:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Thu Jun 13 22:01:20 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 22:01:20 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv
[Thu Jun 13 22:01:20 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun 13 22:01:21 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 22:01:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Thu Jun 13 22:01:21 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun 13 22:01:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Thu Jun 13 22:01:21 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 05:18:20 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 532.006000, observed total counts = 436.000000
[Fri Jun 14 05:18:20 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 19
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 05:18:20 2013] Source 19 is offset by 5.307321 and -1.246757 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.265926 x 1.265926, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 05:18:20 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 14 05:18:20 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 14 05:18:20 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 14 05:18:20 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 14 05:18:20 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 14 05:18:20 2013] Source is confused with source 20
[Fri Jun 14 05:19:14 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri Jun 14 05:19:14 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.44"
[Fri Jun 14 05:19:14 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 42, frac = 1.073
[Fri Jun 14 05:19:14 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 11.44"
[Fri Jun 14 08:29:48 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 08:29:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Fri Jun 14 08:29:48 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 08:29:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Fri Jun 14 08:29:48 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 08:29:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 08:29:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Fri Jun 14 08:29:50 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Fri Jun 14 08:29:50 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Fri Jun 14 08:29:50 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri Jun 14 14:55:43 2013] Warning, spatial fit 17 centroid is now closest to src. 20
[Fri Jun 14 14:55:43 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 919.206000, observed total counts = 809.000000
[Fri Jun 14 14:55:43 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 19
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 14:55:43 2013] Source 19 is offset by 5.307321 and -1.246757 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.265926 x 1.265926, not incorporating fit results
[Fri Jun 14 14:55:44 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri Jun 14 14:55:44 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri Jun 14 14:55:44 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri Jun 14 14:55:44 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri Jun 14 14:55:44 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri Jun 14 14:56:35 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28264.320892, 37699.116180, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Jun 14 14:56:35 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_src.reg
[Fri Jun 14 14:56:35 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (288, 396) - (363, 471)
[Fri Jun 14 14:56:35 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28264.320892, 37699.116180, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(30127.532837, 35186.088470, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27698.568665, 40331.758270, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26634.387787, 38426.801300, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28576.955902, 37195.372162, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26968.358612, 36868.986755, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28932.196167, 36638.957672, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29070.581604, 35866.182190, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27366.676727, 35382.804901, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28837.302765, 35193.756195, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Fri Jun 14 14:56:35 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19.gif
[Fri Jun 14 15:14:01 2013] Mean detx,y = (61.43, -10416.35) 
[Fri Jun 14 15:14:03 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Fri Jun 14 15:14:17 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Fri Jun 14 15:14:17 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_src_b10.pi.gz
[Fri Jun 14 15:14:17 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_bgd.pi.gz
[Fri Jun 14 16:33:55 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Fri Jun 14 16:33:55 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Fri Jun 14 23:51:58 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Fri Jun 14 23:51:58 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_src_b10.pi.gz = 341.00
[Fri Jun 14 23:51:58 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_bgd.pi.gz = 713.00
[Fri Jun 14 23:51:58 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1178792.000000, 4571289.000000
[Fri Jun 14 23:51:58 2013] User source parameters:
  Position = (325.4, 433.9) = 5 41 39.46 -1 46 3.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0
  Source aperture counts = 157.1 +/- 19.5
  Background aperture counts = 183.9
  Rate = 0.007 +/- 0.0008

[Fri Jun 14 23:51:58 2013] Updating counts from extracted products
[Fri Jun 14 23:51:58 2013] Set source signif. to 157.14/13.56 = 11.59
[Fri Jun 14 23:52:22 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Fri Jun 14 23:52:22 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00659, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19.arf
[Fri Jun 14 23:52:22 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Fri Jun 14 23:52:22 2013] Updating source flux to 4.6e-14
[Fri Jun 14 23:53:34 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting
[Fri Jun 14 23:53:45 2013] xmm0112640101/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0112640101_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src19_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete