[Wed Sep 5 07:03:05 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (200.2, 121.8) = 0 19 27.22 81 21 57.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 88.3 +/- 16.4 Background counts = 50.8 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004 [Wed Sep 5 07:03:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.65' [Wed Sep 5 07:05:25 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.75 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Sep 5 07:05:25 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.75" [Wed Sep 5 07:05:25 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.914 [Wed Sep 5 07:05:25 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 13.75" [Wed Sep 5 07:23:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 07:23:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Wed Sep 5 07:23:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 07:23:40 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv [Wed Sep 5 07:23:40 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Sep 5 07:23:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 07:23:40 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 07:23:40 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Wed Sep 5 07:50:37 2012] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 9 at 16.865944 pixels away [Wed Sep 5 07:50:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Sep 5 07:50:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Sep 5 07:50:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Sep 5 07:50:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Sep 5 07:50:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Sep 5 07:50:46 2012] Using EEF radius (= 13.75 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Sep 5 07:50:46 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.75" [Wed Sep 5 07:50:46 2012] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.914 [Wed Sep 5 07:50:46 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 13.75" [Wed Sep 5 08:06:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 08:06:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Wed Sep 5 08:06:42 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 08:06:42 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv [Wed Sep 5 08:06:42 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Sep 5 08:06:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 08:06:43 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists [Wed Sep 5 08:06:43 2012] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0112620201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9 appears to have run properly [Wed Sep 5 08:28:53 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 245.096000, observed total counts = 244.000000 [Wed Sep 5 08:28:53 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.632023 pixels [Wed Sep 5 08:28:53 2012] 246.192300 total counts/ 208.989000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.573474 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 9 = 0.632023 pixels Position = (200.7, 121.3) = 0 19 26.37 81 21 56.1 Extent = 6.7 (4.2-9.9)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 37.2 +/- 15.7 Background counts = 209.0 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.001 [Wed Sep 5 08:28:53 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Sep 5 08:28:53 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Sep 5 08:28:53 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound [Wed Sep 5 08:28:53 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Sep 5 08:28:53 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Sep 5 08:28:53 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9