[Wed Aug  8 17:46:06 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (183.2, 354.1) = 8 43 9.73 70 56 1.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 186.2 +/- 17.7
  Background counts = 33.8
  Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0005

[Wed Aug  8 17:46:07 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 9.28'
[Thu Aug  9 00:03:18 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.07 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug  9 00:03:18 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.07"
[Thu Aug  9 00:03:18 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.917
[Thu Aug  9 00:03:18 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 0, mean size = 11.07"
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.csv
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:20 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:20 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:20 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:37 2012] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 8 at 11.720317 pixels away
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug  9 00:53:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug  9 04:51:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 11.07 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Aug  9 04:51:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.07"
[Thu Aug  9 04:51:02 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 37, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.917
[Thu Aug  9 04:51:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 11.07"
[Thu Aug  9 05:13:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 05:13:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Thu Aug  9 05:13:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 05:13:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.csv
[Thu Aug  9 05:13:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug  9 05:13:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 05:13:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Aug  9 05:13:56 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Thu Aug  9 05:13:56 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.csv
[Thu Aug  9 05:13:56 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112620101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Aug  9 05:14:08 2012] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 8 at 14.825767 pixels away
[Thu Aug  9 05:14:08 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Aug  9 05:14:08 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Aug  9 05:14:08 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Aug  9 05:14:08 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Aug  9 05:14:08 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Aug  9 05:14:08 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9