[Mon Jan 23 10:14:59 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (453.8, 284.7) = 0 41 49.96 41 13 36.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 27.4 +/- 6.8
  Background counts = 4.1
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006

[Mon Jan 23 10:14:59 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.31'
[Mon Jan 23 19:41:45 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.08 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jan 23 19:41:45 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.08"
[Mon Jan 23 19:41:45 2012] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 42, mask sum = 44, frac = 1.024
[Mon Jan 23 19:41:45 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 82 for pass 0, mean size = 12.08"
[Mon Jan 23 23:28:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112570601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src82.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 23:28:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112570601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src82.csv
[Mon Jan 23 23:28:32 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112570601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src82_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 23:28:32 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112570601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src82.csv
[Mon Jan 23 23:28:32 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112570601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src82_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112570601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src82.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jan 23 23:28:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112570601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src82.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 23:28:34 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112570601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src82_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jan 23 23:28:34 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0112570601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src82 appears to have run properly
[Mon Jan 23 23:29:31 2012] Warning, spatial fit 9 centroid is now closest to src. 10
[Mon Jan 23 23:29:31 2012] Warning, spatial fit 11 centroid is now closest to src. 78
[Mon Jan 23 23:29:31 2012] Warning, spatial fit 15 centroid is now closest to src. 9
[Mon Jan 23 23:29:31 2012] Source 83 is offset by -6.203918 and -3.849457 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.379618 x 1.379618, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jan 23 23:29:31 2012] Warning, spatial fit 55 centroid is now closest to src. 21
[Mon Jan 23 23:29:32 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 71.613300, observed total counts = 72.000000
[Mon Jan 23 23:29:32 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 83 = 0.326267 pixels
[Mon Jan 23 23:29:32 2012] 70.921300 total counts/ 52.199000 bgd. counts: snr = 2.591362
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 83 = 0.326267 pixels
  Position = (453.5, 284.8) = 0 41 50.09 41 13 36.5
  Extent = 4.9 (3.4-7.1)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 18.7 +/- 8.4
  Background counts = 52.2
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0007
[Mon Jan 23 23:29:32 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jan 23 23:29:32 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jan 23 23:29:32 2012] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon Jan 23 23:29:32 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jan 23 23:29:32 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jan 23 23:29:32 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.8