[Sat May 18 15:03:30 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (188.9, 321.5) = 10 45 12.67 -59 43 3.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 84.5 +/- 14.1 Background counts = 77.4 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004 [Sat May 18 15:03:30 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.11' [Sat May 18 21:40:30 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat May 18 21:40:30 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.49" [Sat May 18 21:40:30 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.679 [Sat May 18 21:40:30 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 76 for pass 0, mean size = 10.49" [Sun May 19 02:47:37 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src76.ximg exists [Sun May 19 02:47:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src76.csv [Sun May 19 02:47:37 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src76_1.ximg exists [Sun May 19 02:47:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src76.csv [Sun May 19 02:47:37 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src76_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src76.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 19 02:47:41 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src76.ximg exists [Sun May 19 02:47:41 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src76.csv [Sun May 19 02:47:41 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src76_1.ximg exists [Sun May 19 02:47:41 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src76.csv [Sun May 19 02:47:41 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src76_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src76.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 19 06:38:47 2013] Source 64 is offset by 7.075580 and 6.134224 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.994069 x 1.994069, not incorporating fit results [Sun May 19 06:38:47 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun May 19 06:38:47 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun May 19 06:38:47 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Sun May 19 06:38:47 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sun May 19 06:38:47 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun May 19 13:27:51 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun May 19 13:27:51 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.49" [Sun May 19 13:27:51 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 23, frac = 0.679 [Sun May 19 13:27:51 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 67 for pass 1, mean size = 10.49" [Sun May 19 17:44:39 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.ximg exists [Sun May 19 17:44:39 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.csv [Sun May 19 17:44:39 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67_1.ximg exists [Sun May 19 17:44:39 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.csv [Sun May 19 17:44:39 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 19 17:44:40 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.ximg exists [Sun May 19 17:44:41 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.csv [Sun May 19 17:44:41 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg exists [Sun May 19 17:44:41 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.csv [Sun May 19 17:44:41 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src67.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 19 20:37:36 2013] Source 64 is offset by 7.943994 and 5.472270 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 4.009899 x 4.009899, not incorporating fit results [Sun May 19 20:37:36 2013] Source 64 is offset by -2.825109 and -7.712396 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.549361 x 1.549361, not incorporating fit results [Sun May 19 20:37:36 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1479.600000, observed total counts = 1061.000000 [Sun May 19 20:37:36 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 64 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sun May 19 20:37:36 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun May 19 20:37:36 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun May 19 20:37:36 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Sun May 19 20:37:36 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sun May 19 20:37:36 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Mon May 20 01:32:30 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(16386.861481, 27919.217529, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon May 20 01:32:30 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_src.reg [Mon May 20 01:32:30 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (151, 284) - (226, 359) [Mon May 20 01:32:30 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(16386.861481, 27919.217529, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17758.350600, 30445.580800, 2075.188860, 1668.108048, 115.942100, X, Y) && !ellipse(16336.308400, 26189.680000, 1670.080048, 324.180009, 86.119780, X, Y) && !ellipse(15742.424600, 27370.134600, 581.020817, 423.592812, 118.605000, X, Y) && !ellipse(16313.670288, 26547.751526, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17903.266861, 29127.377991, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17391.247116, 27987.496918, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(17433.545715, 25208.392792, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Mon May 20 01:32:30 2013] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64.gif [Mon May 20 02:50:51 2013] Mean detx,y = (6488.90, -7267.18) [Mon May 20 02:50:54 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Mon May 20 02:51:34 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Mon May 20 02:51:34 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_src_b10.pi.gz [Mon May 20 02:51:34 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_bgd.pi.gz [Mon May 20 04:40:52 2013] Not generating rmf since there are only 84 counts [Mon May 20 04:40:52 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Mon May 20 07:48:29 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Mon May 20 07:48:29 2013] Total counts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_src_b10.pi.gz = 532.00 [Mon May 20 07:48:29 2013] Total counts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_bgd.pi.gz = 2192.00 [Mon May 20 07:48:29 2013] Got source and background scale factors 892244.000000, 5390253.000000 [Mon May 20 07:48:29 2013] User source parameters: Position = (188.9, 321.5) = 10 45 12.67 -59 43 3.9 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 Source aperture counts = 169.2 +/- 24.1 Background aperture counts = 362.8 Rate = 0.005 +/- 0.0007 [Mon May 20 07:48:29 2013] Updating counts from extracted products [Mon May 20 07:48:29 2013] Set source signif. to 169.16/19.05 = 8.88 [Mon May 20 07:48:34 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Mon May 20 07:48:34 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.00481, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64.arf [Mon May 20 07:48:34 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Mon May 20 07:48:34 2013] Updating source flux to 2.2e-13 [Mon May 20 07:49:05 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting [Mon May 20 07:49:37 2013] xmm0112560201/analysis//spectral/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112560201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src64_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete