[Thu May 30 16:46:21 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (259.1, 132.3) = 12 26 1.77 33 19 3.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 29.6 +/- 7.1
  Background counts = 4.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0005

[Thu May 30 16:46:21 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.38'
[Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.62"
[Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.908
[Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 0, mean size = 12.62"
[Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.csv
[Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 30 19:11:13 2013] Warning: source 17 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 20 at 14.686369 pixels away
[Thu May 30 19:11:13 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 30 19:11:13 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 30 19:11:13 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 30 19:11:13 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 30 19:11:13 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.62"
[Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.908
[Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 16 for pass 1, mean size = 12.62"
[Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.csv
[Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.csv
[Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src16.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 30 21:04:27 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 74.435600, observed total counts = 61.000000
[Thu May 30 21:04:27 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 20
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 30 21:04:27 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 30 21:04:27 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 30 21:04:27 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 30 21:04:27 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 30 21:04:27 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00