[Thu May 30 16:46:21 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (315.3, 419.3) = 12 25 42.24 33 39 57.8 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 46.1 +/- 8.6 Background counts = 6.0 Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.0005 [Thu May 30 16:46:21 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.85' [Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.85 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.85" [Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 28, frac = 0.780 [Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 0, mean size = 10.85" [Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg exists [Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv [Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg exists [Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.csv [Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists [Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv [Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists [Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.csv [Thu May 30 19:10:49 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 30 19:11:13 2013] Warning: source 14 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 14.414136 pixels away [Thu May 30 19:11:13 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu May 30 19:11:13 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu May 30 19:11:13 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Thu May 30 19:11:13 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Thu May 30 19:11:13 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.85 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.85" [Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 35, mask sum = 28, frac = 0.780 [Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 10.85" [Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists [Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv [Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists [Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv [Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists [Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv [Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists [Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv [Thu May 30 21:04:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Thu May 30 21:04:27 2013] Warning: source 13 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 11 at 14.413616 pixels away [Thu May 30 21:04:27 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Thu May 30 21:04:27 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Thu May 30 21:04:27 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Thu May 30 21:04:27 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Thu May 30 21:04:27 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00