[Thu May 30 16:45:48 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (112.3, 348.7) = 12 26 52.91 33 34 45.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 25.0 +/- 6.8
  Background counts = 4.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004

[Thu May 30 16:45:49 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.98'
[Thu May 30 18:01:42 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.42 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 30 18:01:42 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.42"
[Thu May 30 18:01:42 2013] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.953
[Thu May 30 18:01:42 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 20 for pass 0, mean size = 13.42"
[Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv
[Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.csv
[Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.csv
[Thu May 30 18:38:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src20.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 30 19:11:08 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 70.952800, observed total counts = 63.000000
[Thu May 30 19:11:08 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 30 19:11:08 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 30 19:11:08 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 30 19:11:08 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 30 19:11:08 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 30 19:11:08 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 30 20:11:53 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.42 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 30 20:11:53 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.42"
[Thu May 30 20:11:53 2013] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 51, mask sum = 49, frac = 0.953
[Thu May 30 20:11:53 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 1, mean size = 13.42"
[Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Thu May 30 20:37:43 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112521901_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 30 21:04:23 2013] Warning: source 15 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 9 at 17.417234 pixels away
[Thu May 30 21:04:23 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 30 21:04:23 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 30 21:04:23 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 30 21:04:23 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 30 21:04:23 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00