[Tue Aug  7 10:16:09 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (363.9, 455.6) = 16 40 23.94 -24 28 53.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 34.7 +/- 8.0
  Background counts = 12.8
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006

[Tue Aug  7 10:16:09 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 12.34'
[Tue Aug  7 10:18:47 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Aug  7 10:18:47 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.60"
[Tue Aug  7 10:18:47 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 38, frac = 0.824
[Tue Aug  7 10:18:47 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 12.60"
[Tue Aug  7 10:44:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 10:44:53 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Tue Aug  7 10:44:53 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 10:44:53 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Tue Aug  7 10:44:53 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug  7 10:44:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 10:44:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Aug  7 10:44:54 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 10:44:54 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Aug  7 10:44:54 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug  7 11:26:37 2012] Warning: source 6 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 6 at 16.111647 pixels away
[Tue Aug  7 11:26:37 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Aug  7 11:26:37 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Aug  7 11:26:37 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Aug  7 11:26:37 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Aug  7 11:26:37 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Aug  7 11:26:53 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.60 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Aug  7 11:26:53 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.60"
[Tue Aug  7 11:26:53 2012] source mask rpix=2.9, npix_max = 46, mask sum = 38, frac = 0.824
[Tue Aug  7 11:26:53 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 1, mean size = 12.60"
[Tue Aug  7 11:53:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 11:53:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Tue Aug  7 11:53:29 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 11:53:29 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.csv
[Tue Aug  7 11:53:29 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug  7 11:53:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 11:53:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Aug  7 11:53:30 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Tue Aug  7 11:53:30 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.csv
[Tue Aug  7 11:53:30 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112480301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Aug  7 12:29:31 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 169.036000, observed total counts = 113.000000
[Tue Aug  7 12:29:31 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 6
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Aug  7 12:29:31 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Aug  7 12:29:31 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Aug  7 12:29:31 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Aug  7 12:29:31 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Aug  7 12:29:31 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Aug  7 12:29:31 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9