[Sun Jun  2 00:03:36 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (298.4, 327.7) = 6 48 5.28 -44 18 26.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 72.7 +/- 11.0
  Background counts = 10.2
  Rate = 0.06 +/- 0.009

[Sun Jun  2 00:03:37 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.12'
[Sun Jun  2 00:06:34 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  2 00:06:34 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.49"
[Sun Jun  2 00:06:34 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 24, frac = 1.216
[Sun Jun  2 00:06:34 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 7.49"
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:16 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:16 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:18 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Warning, spatial fit 23 centroid is now closest to src. 26
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Source 24 is offset by -2.719329 and -1.012427 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.836492 x 0.836492, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Source 24 is offset by -2.605122 and -1.317300 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.877379 x 0.877379, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Source is confused with source 39
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:28 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.49 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:28 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.49"
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:28 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 19, mask sum = 24, frac = 1.216
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:28 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 1, mean size = 7.49"
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:46 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:46 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.csv
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:46 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.csv
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:38 2013] Warning, spatial fit 18 centroid is now closest to src. 39
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:38 2013] Source 24 is offset by -4.602294 and 4.999343 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.870713 x 0.870713, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:38 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:38 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:38 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:38 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:38 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:53 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(25912.692413, 28459.616882, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:53 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src24_src.reg
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:53 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (261, 290) - (336, 365)
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:53 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(25912.692413, 28459.616882, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27785.767792, 29590.481476, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28061.667816, 29180.977722, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25347.192413, 28129.121490, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25110.246979, 27889.181183, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25694.071991, 27537.055267, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25241.493042, 27371.216827, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24366.307770, 27451.462433, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23151.477875, 26817.969788, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23868.420746, 26479.416382, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26399.760193, 28765.784241, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26853.294952, 28502.662872, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26769.380096, 27521.934875, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:53 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src24.gif