[Sun Jun  2 00:03:36 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (323.1, 336.0) = 6 47 55.27 -44 17 54.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 38.2 +/- 9.7
  Background counts = 14.5
  Rate = 0.03 +/- 0.007

[Sun Jun  2 00:03:37 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.26'
[Sun Jun  2 00:06:34 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.06 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  2 00:06:34 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.06"
[Sun Jun  2 00:06:34 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.723
[Sun Jun  2 00:06:34 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 0, mean size = 8.06"
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:16 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:16 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:16 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.csv
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:16 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Sun Jun  2 04:12:18 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Source 23 is offset by -7.295565 and -4.556946 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.079485 x 1.079485, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:12 2013] Source is confused with source 21
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:28 2013] Using EEF radius (= 8.06 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:28 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.06"
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:28 2013] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.723
[Sun Jun  2 04:29:28 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 17 for pass 1, mean size = 8.06"
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:46 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:46 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:46 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.csv
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:46 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.csv
[Sun Jun  2 07:57:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src17.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:38 2013] Source 23 is offset by -4.227175 and 0.756581 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 3.935733 x 7.408506, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:38 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:38 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:38 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:38 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:38 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:53 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(28061.667816, 29180.977722, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:53 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23_src.reg
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:53 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (286, 298) - (361, 373)
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:53 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(28061.667816, 29180.977722, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(31324.860000, 31861.777800, 1587.176046, 830.872024, 168.869700, X, Y) && !ellipse(30314.250000, 31211.949800, 1515.176044, 1515.176044, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29022.976080, 30475.297160, 804.904023, 804.904023, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27785.767792, 29590.481476, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25912.692413, 28459.616882, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25347.192413, 28129.121490, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25110.246979, 27889.181183, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25694.071991, 27537.055267, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25241.493042, 27371.216827, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26399.760193, 28765.784241, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26853.294952, 28502.662872, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26769.380096, 27521.934875, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sun Jun  2 08:09:53 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0112450401_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src23.gif