[Mon Jun 10 11:51:00 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (443.3, 237.1) = 5 35 34.63 -1 17 47.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 57.8 +/- 9.8
  Background counts = 6.4
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Mon Jun 10 11:51:00 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 11.40'
[Mon Jun 10 11:52:44 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.13 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 10 11:52:44 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.13"
[Mon Jun 10 11:52:44 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.971
[Mon Jun 10 11:52:44 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 26 for pass 0, mean size = 12.13"
[Mon Jun 10 12:32:37 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src26.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 12:32:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src26.csv
[Mon Jun 10 12:32:37 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src26_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 12:32:37 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src26.csv
[Mon Jun 10 12:32:37 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src26_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src26.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 12:32:38 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src26.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 12:32:38 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src26.csv
[Mon Jun 10 12:32:38 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src26_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 12:32:38 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src26.csv
[Mon Jun 10 12:32:38 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src26_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src26.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 13:35:27 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 133.149000, observed total counts = 118.000000
[Mon Jun 10 13:35:27 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 26
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 10 13:35:27 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 10 13:35:27 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 10 13:35:27 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 10 13:35:27 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 10 13:35:27 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 10 13:35:41 2013] Using EEF radius (= 12.13 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 10 13:35:41 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.13"
[Mon Jun 10 13:35:41 2013] source mask rpix=2.8, npix_max = 43, mask sum = 42, frac = 0.971
[Mon Jun 10 13:35:41 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 1, mean size = 12.13"
[Mon Jun 10 13:58:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 13:58:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Mon Jun 10 13:58:00 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 13:58:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv
[Mon Jun 10 13:58:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 13:58:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 13:58:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Mon Jun 10 13:58:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 13:58:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Mon Jun 10 13:58:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112400101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 14:41:20 2013] Warning: source 15 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 26 at 15.477831 pixels away
[Mon Jun 10 14:41:20 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 10 14:41:20 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 10 14:41:20 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 10 14:41:20 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 10 14:41:20 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 10 14:41:20 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9