[Sat Jun 2 23:27:07 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (291.4, 181.5) = 4 37 21.49 -47 21 53.4 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 57.4 +/- 10.6 Background counts = 28.0 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002 [Sat Jun 2 23:27:07 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.49' [Sat Jun 2 23:28:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sat Jun 2 23:28:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.67" [Sat Jun 2 23:28:52 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 27, frac = 0.774 [Sat Jun 2 23:28:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 41 for pass 0, mean size = 10.67" [Sun Jun 3 00:26:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.ximg exists [Sun Jun 3 00:26:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.csv [Sun Jun 3 00:26:18 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 3 00:26:18 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.csv [Sun Jun 3 00:26:18 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 3 00:26:19 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.ximg exists [Sun Jun 3 00:26:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.csv [Sun Jun 3 00:26:19 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 3 00:26:19 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.csv [Sun Jun 3 00:26:19 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src41.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 3 01:43:26 2012] Warning: source 41 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 41 at 17.267062 pixels away [Sun Jun 3 01:43:26 2012] Warning: source 43 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 41 at 10.634072 pixels away [Sun Jun 3 01:43:26 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 3 01:43:26 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 3 01:43:26 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jun 3 01:43:26 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 3 01:43:26 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jun 3 01:43:26 2012] Source is confused with source 43 [Sun Jun 3 01:43:43 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun Jun 3 01:43:43 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.67" [Sun Jun 3 01:43:43 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 34, mask sum = 27, frac = 0.774 [Sun Jun 3 01:43:43 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 33 for pass 1, mean size = 10.67" [Sun Jun 3 02:23:07 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.ximg exists [Sun Jun 3 02:23:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.csv [Sun Jun 3 02:23:07 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 3 02:23:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.csv [Sun Jun 3 02:23:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 3 02:23:07 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33.ximg exists [Sun Jun 3 02:23:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33.csv [Sun Jun 3 02:23:07 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg exists [Sun Jun 3 02:23:07 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33.csv [Sun Jun 3 02:23:07 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112320201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src33.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun Jun 3 03:14:00 2012] Warning, spatial fit 33 centroid is now closest to src. 43 [Sun Jun 3 03:14:00 2012] Warning: source 35 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 41 at 10.634072 pixels away [Sun Jun 3 03:14:00 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun Jun 3 03:14:00 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun Jun 3 03:14:00 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Sun Jun 3 03:14:00 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Sun Jun 3 03:14:00 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun Jun 3 03:14:00 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9