[Wed Jun  5 12:38:26 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (261.2, 311.8) = 2 57 58.86 13 4 6.8
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 147.8 +/- 23.1
  Background counts = 125.7
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.003

[Wed Jun  5 12:38:27 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.87'
[Wed Jun  5 12:40:46 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun  5 12:40:46 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.86"
[Wed Jun  5 12:40:46 2013] source mask rpix=1.8, npix_max = 21, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.174
[Wed Jun  5 12:40:46 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 0, mean size = 7.86"
[Wed Jun  5 15:49:10 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg exists
[Wed Jun  5 15:49:10 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun  5 15:49:10 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28 appears to have run properly
[Wed Jun  5 15:49:11 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Wed Jun  5 15:49:11 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun  5 15:49:11 2013] Fit fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28 appears to have run properly
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:05 2013] Source 29 is offset by 3.782424 and 1.128709 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.895260 x 0.895260, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:05 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 1902.020000, observed total counts = 1847.000000
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:05 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 4.810308 pixels
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:05 2013] 1843.438000 total counts/ 1661.790000 bgd. counts: snr = 4.455973
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 4.810308 pixels
  Position = (256.9, 313.9) = 2 58 0.15 13 4 13.8
  Extent = 15.2 (14.2-15.7)", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 181.6 +/- 42.9
  Background counts = 1661.8
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.005
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:05 2013] Source 29 is offset by -4.327515 and 1.136430 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.910083 x 1.369572, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:05 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:05 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:05 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:05 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:05 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:05 2013] Source is confused with source 20
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:05 2013] Source is confused with source 47
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:34 2013] Using previous fit value to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:34 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 15.21"
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:34 2013] source mask rpix=3.5, npix_max = 63, mask sum = 48, frac = 0.752
[Wed Jun  5 21:15:34 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 21 for pass 1, mean size = 15.21"
[Wed Jun  5 23:12:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg exists
[Wed Jun  5 23:12:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.csv
[Wed Jun  5 23:12:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun  5 23:12:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.csv
[Wed Jun  5 23:12:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun  5 23:12:48 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg exists
[Wed Jun  5 23:12:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Wed Jun  5 23:12:48 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun  5 23:12:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.csv
[Wed Jun  5 23:12:48 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112260101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src21.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  6 03:24:45 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3944.880000, observed total counts = 3873.000000
[Thu Jun  6 03:24:45 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 1.515128 pixels
[Thu Jun  6 03:24:45 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 21 to 13
[Thu Jun  6 03:24:45 2013] 3901.563300 total counts/ 3888.770000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.205152
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 29 = 1.515128 pixels
  Position = (257.5, 315.2) = 2 57 59.96 13 4 19.7
  Extent = 3.8" x 3.8", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 12.8 +/- 62.5
  Background counts = 3888.8
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.007
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability