[Tue Jul 17 10:18:18 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (318.5, 176.8) = 16 15 42.51 -6 19 24.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 102.9 +/- 14.5
  Background counts = 31.4
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Tue Jul 17 10:18:18 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.94'
[Tue Jul 17 10:21:12 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 17 10:21:12 2012] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue Jul 17 10:21:12 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.90"
[Tue Jul 17 10:21:12 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.996
[Tue Jul 17 10:21:12 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 23 for pass 0, mean size = 10.90"
[Tue Jul 17 11:43:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 11:43:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Tue Jul 17 11:43:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 11:43:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.csv
[Tue Jul 17 11:43:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 17 11:43:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 11:43:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue Jul 17 11:43:55 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 11:43:55 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.csv
[Tue Jul 17 11:43:55 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src23.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 17 14:08:11 2012] Warning: source 23 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 23 at 15.401993 pixels away
[Tue Jul 17 14:08:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 17 14:08:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 17 14:08:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 17 14:08:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 17 14:08:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 17 14:08:27 2012] Using EEF radius (= 10.90 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jul 17 14:08:27 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.90"
[Tue Jul 17 14:08:27 2012] source mask rpix=2.5, npix_max = 36, mask sum = 36, frac = 0.996
[Tue Jul 17 14:08:27 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 10.90"
[Tue Jul 17 14:59:47 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 14:59:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Tue Jul 17 14:59:47 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 14:59:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Tue Jul 17 14:59:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 17 14:59:47 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 14:59:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Tue Jul 17 14:59:47 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jul 17 14:59:47 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Tue Jul 17 14:59:47 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112231501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jul 17 17:50:41 2012] Warning: source 13 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 23 at 15.531488 pixels away
[Tue Jul 17 17:50:41 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jul 17 17:50:41 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jul 17 17:50:41 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jul 17 17:50:41 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jul 17 17:50:41 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jul 17 17:50:41 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9