[Sun Jun  3 05:25:34 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (318.9, 302.3) = 14 25 56.02 37 51 44.0
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 143.1 +/- 19.9
  Background counts = 116.3
  Rate = 0.009 +/- 0.001

[Sun Jun  3 05:25:34 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 1.51'
[Sun Jun  3 05:28:08 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  3 05:28:08 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.18"
[Sun Jun  3 05:28:08 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.702
[Sun Jun  3 05:28:08 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 30 for pass 0, mean size = 7.18"
[Sun Jun  3 06:54:10 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 06:54:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.csv
[Sun Jun  3 06:54:10 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 06:54:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.csv
[Sun Jun  3 06:54:10 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  3 06:54:10 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 06:54:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Sun Jun  3 06:54:10 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 06:54:10 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.csv
[Sun Jun  3 06:54:10 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src30.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:00 2012] Source 30 is offset by 3.221882 and -5.165867 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.120832 x 1.120832, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:00 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 2465.770000, observed total counts = 1842.000000
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:00 2012] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 30
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:00 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:00 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:00 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:00 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:00 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:00 2012] Source is confused with source 33
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:19 2012] Using EEF radius (= 7.18 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:19 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.18"
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:19 2012] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 18, mask sum = 13, frac = 0.702
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:19 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 14 for pass 1, mean size = 7.18"
[Sun Jun  3 09:18:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 09:18:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Sun Jun  3 09:18:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 09:18:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.csv
[Sun Jun  3 09:18:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  3 09:18:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 09:18:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Sun Jun  3 09:18:51 2012] fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 09:18:51 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.csv
[Sun Jun  3 09:18:51 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src14.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  3 10:54:59 2012] Source 30 is offset by 6.891353 and 5.440662 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 6.604230 x 6.604230, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  3 10:54:59 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  3 10:54:59 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  3 10:54:59 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  3 10:54:59 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  3 10:54:59 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  3 10:54:59 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9