[Sun Jun  3 05:26:30 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (338.5, 276.5) = 14 25 48.82 37 49 59.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 54.9 +/- 13.9
  Background counts = 56.3
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0006

[Sun Jun  3 05:26:30 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.31'
[Sun Jun  3 07:48:02 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.08 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  3 07:48:02 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.08"
[Sun Jun  3 07:48:02 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.124
[Sun Jun  3 07:48:02 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 31 for pass 0, mean size = 8.08"
[Sun Jun  3 08:41:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 08:41:49 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.csv
[Sun Jun  3 08:41:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 08:41:49 2012] Warning: model total counts is not > 0 in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.csv
[Sun Jun  3 08:41:49 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src31.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sun Jun  3 08:41:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 08:41:49 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 08:41:49 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src31 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:11 2012] Source 25 is offset by -6.950535 and 6.370853 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.929076 x 0.929076, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:11 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:11 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:11 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:11 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:11 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  3 08:42:11 2012] Source is confused with source 28
[Sun Jun  3 09:49:08 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.08 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sun Jun  3 09:49:08 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.08"
[Sun Jun  3 09:49:08 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.124
[Sun Jun  3 09:49:08 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 1, mean size = 8.08"
[Sun Jun  3 10:54:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 10:54:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 10:54:53 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jun  3 10:54:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 10:54:54 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists
[Sun Jun  3 10:54:54 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0112230201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28 appears to have run properly
[Sun Jun  3 10:55:07 2012] Source 25 is offset by -0.056833 and -1.182619 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.927926 x 0.979614, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  3 10:55:07 2012] Source 25 is offset by -6.641155 and 6.372623 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.929076 x 0.929076, not incorporating fit results
[Sun Jun  3 10:55:07 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sun Jun  3 10:55:07 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sun Jun  3 10:55:07 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sun Jun  3 10:55:07 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sun Jun  3 10:55:07 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sun Jun  3 10:55:07 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9