[Sat Aug 11 10:15:46 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (256.1, 318.3) = 18 56 19.09 1 16 9.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 72.7 +/- 14.4
  Background counts = 45.9
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.002

[Sat Aug 11 10:15:47 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.39'
[Sat Aug 11 11:12:43 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.12 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 11 11:12:43 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.12"
[Sat Aug 11 11:12:43 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.115
[Sat Aug 11 11:12:43 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 8.12"
[Sat Aug 11 12:07:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 12:07:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Sat Aug 11 12:07:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 12:07:00 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0112201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Sat Aug 11 12:07:00 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0112201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0112201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat Aug 11 12:07:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 12:07:00 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 12:07:00 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0112201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5 appears to have run properly
[Sat Aug 11 13:25:05 2012] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 5
[Sat Aug 11 13:25:05 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat Aug 11 13:25:05 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat Aug 11 13:25:05 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat Aug 11 13:25:05 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat Aug 11 13:25:05 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat Aug 11 13:25:05 2012] Source is confused with source 5
[Sat Aug 11 14:28:04 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.12 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Sat Aug 11 14:28:04 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.12"
[Sat Aug 11 14:28:04 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 22, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.115
[Sat Aug 11 14:28:04 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 8.12"
[Sat Aug 11 15:16:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 15:16:58 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 15:16:58 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0112201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4 appears to have run properly
[Sat Aug 11 15:16:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 15:16:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0112201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Sat Aug 11 15:16:59 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0112201101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4 appears to have run properly
[Sat Aug 11 16:15:38 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 1265.440000, observed total counts = 1251.000000
[Sat Aug 11 16:15:38 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 0.163036 pixels
[Sat Aug 11 16:15:38 2012] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 4 to 3
[Sat Aug 11 16:15:38 2012] 1248.650600 total counts/ 1231.840000 bgd. counts: snr = 0.478968
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 2 = 0.163036 pixels
  Position = (256.1, 318.2) = 18 56 19.11 1 16 9.1
  Extent = 4.1" x 4.1", rotation angle = 0
  Source counts = 16.8 +/- 35.3
  Background counts = 1231.8
  Rate = 0.003 +/- 0.006
  Deleting source due to low Poisson probability