[Wed Jun 27 14:42:05 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (331.0, 338.1) = 19 48 32.37 77 45 40.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 40.9 +/- 9.7
  Background counts = 18.8
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0009

[Wed Jun 27 14:42:05 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 3.72'
[Wed Jun 27 14:50:51 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 27 14:50:51 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.29"
[Wed Jun 27 14:50:51 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.864
[Wed Jun 27 14:50:51 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 6 for pass 0, mean size = 8.29"
[Wed Jun 27 15:00:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111971601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 15:00:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111971601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Wed Jun 27 15:00:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111971601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 15:00:05 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111971601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.csv
[Wed Jun 27 15:00:05 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111971601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111971601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src6.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed Jun 27 15:00:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111971601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 15:00:05 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111971601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 15:00:05 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0111971601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src6 appears to have run properly
[Wed Jun 27 15:12:09 2012] Source 3 is offset by -5.013082 and 1.947095 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.952740 x 0.952740, not incorporating fit results
[Wed Jun 27 15:12:09 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 27 15:12:09 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 27 15:12:09 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 27 15:12:09 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 27 15:12:09 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 27 15:19:52 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.29 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed Jun 27 15:19:52 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.29"
[Wed Jun 27 15:19:52 2012] source mask rpix=1.9, npix_max = 23, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.864
[Wed Jun 27 15:19:52 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 4 for pass 1, mean size = 8.29"
[Wed Jun 27 15:25:55 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111971601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 15:25:55 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111971601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 15:25:55 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0111971601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src4 appears to have run properly
[Wed Jun 27 15:25:55 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111971601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 15:25:55 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111971601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4_1.ximg exists
[Wed Jun 27 15:25:55 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0111971601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src4 appears to have run properly
[Wed Jun 27 15:28:45 2012] Warning: source 4 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 3 at 11.382024 pixels away
[Wed Jun 27 15:28:45 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed Jun 27 15:28:45 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed Jun 27 15:28:45 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed Jun 27 15:28:45 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed Jun 27 15:28:45 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed Jun 27 15:28:45 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9