[Tue Apr 10 13:06:28 2012] Detection parameters:
  Position = (270.1, 353.9) = 9 55 58.86 69 6 19.6
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 67.9 +/- 12.9
  Background counts = 37.7
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0002

[Tue Apr 10 13:06:29 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 4.52'
[Tue Apr 10 13:06:49 2012] Using EEF radius (= 8.69 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Apr 10 13:06:49 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 8.69"
[Tue Apr 10 13:06:49 2012] source mask rpix=2.0, npix_max = 24, mask sum = 25, frac = 1.002
[Tue Apr 10 13:06:49 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 65 for pass 0, mean size = 8.69"
[Tue Apr 10 13:06:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111800101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 13:06:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111800101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.csv
[Tue Apr 10 13:06:50 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111800101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 13:06:50 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111800101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.csv
[Tue Apr 10 13:06:50 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0111800101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0111800101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src65.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Apr 10 13:06:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111800101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 13:06:53 2012] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111800101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65_1.ximg exists
[Tue Apr 10 13:06:53 2012] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0111800101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src65 appears to have run properly
[Tue Apr 10 13:07:06 2012] Warning: source 39 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 39 at 10.596963 pixels away
[Tue Apr 10 13:07:06 2012] Warning: source 65 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 39 at 10.011993 pixels away
[Tue Apr 10 13:07:06 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Apr 10 13:07:06 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Apr 10 13:07:06 2012] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Apr 10 13:07:06 2012] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Apr 10 13:07:06 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Apr 10 13:07:06 2012] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9