[Thu Jun  6 01:19:51 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (80.7, 319.5) = 2 9 23.99 77 18 20.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 66.8 +/- 15.1
  Background counts = 68.0
  Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003

[Thu Jun  6 01:19:56 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 15.86'
[Thu Jun  6 02:02:11 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun  6 02:02:11 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Thu Jun  6 02:02:11 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.36"
[Thu Jun  6 02:02:11 2013] source mask rpix=3.3, npix_max = 57, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.589
[Thu Jun  6 02:02:11 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 90 for pass 0, mean size = 14.36"
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:04 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.csv
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:04 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:04 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.csv
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:04 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src90.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.csv
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:07 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:07 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.csv
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:07 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src90.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:24 2013] Warning: source 90 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 14 at 17.630205 pixels away
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:24 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:24 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:24 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:24 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:24 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun  6 08:27:24 2013] Source is confused with source 8
[Thu Jun  6 08:39:12 2013] Using EEF radius (= 14.36 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu Jun  6 08:39:12 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 14.36"
[Thu Jun  6 08:39:12 2013] source mask rpix=3.3, npix_max = 57, mask sum = 34, frac = 0.589
[Thu Jun  6 08:39:12 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 61 for pass 1, mean size = 14.36"
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:21 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src61.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src61.csv
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:21 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src61_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:21 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src61.csv
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:21 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src61_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:23 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src61.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:23 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src61.csv
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:23 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg exists
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:23 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src61.csv
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:23 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src61_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111520101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src61.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:36 2013] Warning, spatial fit 61 centroid is now closest to src. 75
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:36 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:36 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:36 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:36 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:36 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu Jun  6 12:09:36 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9