[Mon May 27 10:33:33 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (375.4, 127.0) = 22 8 17.31 45 31 20.1
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 135.6 +/- 20.4
  Background counts = 42.5
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Mon May 27 10:33:35 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.62'
[Mon May 27 10:35:22 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.24 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 27 10:35:22 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.24"
[Mon May 27 10:35:22 2013] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 50, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.115
[Mon May 27 10:35:22 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 69 for pass 0, mean size = 13.24"
[Mon May 27 20:00:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 20:00:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.csv
[Mon May 27 20:00:57 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 20:00:57 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.csv
[Mon May 27 20:00:57 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 20:01:02 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 20:01:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Mon May 27 20:01:02 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 20:01:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.csv
[Mon May 27 20:01:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src69.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 20:01:39 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 100.847000, observed total counts = 101.000000
[Mon May 27 20:01:39 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 71 = 1.006158 pixels
[Mon May 27 20:01:39 2013] Warning, changing simple spatial fit ID from 69 to 61
[Mon May 27 20:01:39 2013] 88.624400 total counts/ 70.438900 bgd. counts: snr = 2.166801
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 71 = 1.006158 pixels
  Position = (375.6, 128.0) = 22 8 17.19 45 31 21.1
  Extent = 26.0 (13.3-52.0)", rotation angle = 64 (59-71) degrees
  Source counts = 18.2 +/- 9.4
  Background counts = 70.4
  Rate = 0.0009 +/- 0.0004
[Mon May 27 20:01:39 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 98.480400, observed total counts = 84.000000
[Mon May 27 20:01:39 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 71
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon May 27 20:01:40 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 27 20:01:40 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 27 20:01:40 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Mon May 27 20:01:40 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 27 20:01:40 2013] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 3.07
[Mon May 27 20:01:40 2013] Source is asymmetric
[Mon May 27 20:01:40 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.7