[Mon May 27 10:33:31 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (461.9, 183.5) = 22 7 41.39 45 35 18.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 114.3 +/- 21.0
  Background counts = 107.2
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Mon May 27 10:33:35 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.49'
[Mon May 27 10:35:22 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 27 10:35:22 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Mon May 27 10:35:22 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.67"
[Mon May 27 10:35:22 2013] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.055
[Mon May 27 10:35:22 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 25 for pass 0, mean size = 13.67"
[Mon May 27 20:00:55 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 20:00:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Mon May 27 20:00:55 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 20:00:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.csv
[Mon May 27 20:00:55 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 20:01:00 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 20:01:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Mon May 27 20:01:00 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg exists
[Mon May 27 20:01:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.csv
[Mon May 27 20:01:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src25.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon May 27 20:01:39 2013] Warning: source 25 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 27 at 18.244305 pixels away
[Mon May 27 20:01:39 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon May 27 20:01:39 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon May 27 20:01:39 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon May 27 20:01:39 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon May 27 20:01:39 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon May 27 20:01:56 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.67 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon May 27 20:01:56 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.67"
[Mon May 27 20:01:56 2013] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 53, mask sum = 56, frac = 1.055
[Mon May 27 20:01:56 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 22 for pass 1, mean size = 13.67"
[Tue May 28 03:21:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22.ximg exists
[Tue May 28 03:21:15 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 28 03:21:15 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src22 appears to have run properly
[Tue May 28 03:21:17 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg exists
[Tue May 28 03:21:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Tue May 28 03:21:17 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg exists
[Tue May 28 03:21:17 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.csv
[Tue May 28 03:21:17 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0111370101_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src22.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue May 28 03:21:51 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 89.149700, observed total counts = 82.000000
[Tue May 28 03:21:51 2013] Offset between fit and detection position for source 27 = 3.840946 pixels
[Tue May 28 03:21:51 2013] 86.135400 total counts/ 37.541200 bgd. counts: snr = 7.931044
Spatial fit parameters:
  Offset between fit and detection position for source 27 = 3.840946 pixels
  Position = (464.3, 186.6) = 22 7 40.42 45 35 34.8
  Extent = 27.2 (27.0-27.3)" x 16.6 (4.9-27.3)", rotation angle = 98 (90-90) degrees
  Source counts = 48.6 +/- 9.3
  Background counts = 37.5
  Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004
[Tue May 28 03:21:51 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue May 28 03:21:51 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue May 28 03:21:51 2013] Assessing source extent using major axis lower bound
[Tue May 28 03:21:51 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue May 28 03:21:51 2013] Computing asymmetry using errors on major and minor axis (from spatial fitting), asym = 0.99
[Tue May 28 03:21:51 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9