[Thu May 23 13:40:45 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (303.5, 376.7) = 17 2 48.24 -48 43 25.9
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 143.3 +/- 23.0
  Background counts = 234.8
  Rate = 0.04 +/- 0.006

[Thu May 23 13:40:50 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.69'
[Thu May 23 13:45:44 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.27 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 23 13:45:44 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.27"
[Thu May 23 13:45:44 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.578
[Thu May 23 13:45:44 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 88 for pass 0, mean size = 9.27"
[Thu May 23 22:04:15 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.ximg exists
[Thu May 23 22:04:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.csv
[Thu May 23 22:04:15 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 23 22:04:15 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.csv
[Thu May 23 22:04:15 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 23 22:04:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.ximg exists
[Thu May 23 22:04:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.csv
[Thu May 23 22:04:18 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 23 22:04:18 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.csv
[Thu May 23 22:04:18 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 24 14:02:04 2013] Source 90 is offset by 0.512005 and 4.373575 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.099467 x 1.099467, not incorporating fit results
[Fri May 24 14:02:04 2013] Warning, spatial fit 88 centroid is now closest to src. 96
[Fri May 24 14:02:04 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Fri May 24 14:02:04 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Fri May 24 14:02:04 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Fri May 24 14:02:04 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Fri May 24 14:02:04 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Fri May 24 14:03:20 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.27 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Fri May 24 14:03:20 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.27"
[Fri May 24 14:03:20 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.578
[Fri May 24 14:03:20 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 62 for pass 1, mean size = 9.27"
[Fri May 24 23:51:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src62.ximg exists
[Fri May 24 23:51:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src62.csv
[Fri May 24 23:51:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src62_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 24 23:51:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src62.csv
[Fri May 24 23:51:55 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src62_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Fri May 24 23:52:14 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src62.ximg exists
[Fri May 24 23:52:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src62.csv
[Fri May 24 23:52:14 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg exists
[Fri May 24 23:52:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src62.csv
[Fri May 24 23:52:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src62_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src62.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Sat May 25 17:23:05 2013] Source 90 is offset by 1.025821 and 4.261690 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.085246 x 1.085246, not incorporating fit results
[Sat May 25 17:23:05 2013] Warning, spatial fit 62 centroid is now closest to src. 96
[Sat May 25 17:23:06 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Sat May 25 17:23:06 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Sat May 25 17:23:06 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Sat May 25 17:23:06 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Sat May 25 17:23:06 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Sat May 25 17:23:06 2013] Source is confused with source 87
[Sat May 25 17:23:06 2013] Source is confused with source 88
[Sat May 25 17:24:29 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(26355.134460, 32728.665039, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Sat May 25 17:24:29 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90_src.reg
[Sat May 25 17:24:29 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (266, 339) - (341, 414)
[Sat May 25 17:24:29 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(26355.134460, 32728.665039, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25608.099360, 27790.010400, 3464.520100, 1911.897655, 79.822900, X, Y) && !ellipse(27324.590000, 30584.870000, 2990.080086, 1360.528039, 112.193100, X, Y) && !ellipse(27891.178000, 32004.314000, 1495.040043, 1495.040043, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24010.770142, 30713.896057, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28985.140106, 30311.513092, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25449.474762, 31171.875336, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25014.854000, 34352.390000, 1547.960045, 1547.960045, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28312.908000, 32759.422000, 2916.368084, 2916.368084, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(25664.820000, 32905.004000, 3095.920089, 3095.920089, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28034.654000, 32446.926000, 1528.264044, 1528.264044, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27888.892000, 32033.932000, 1495.040043, 1495.040043, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26803.991058, 32137.745789, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29145.746000, 31146.584000, 3036.336087, 1123.664032, 135.256000, X, Y)
[Sat May 25 17:24:29 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90.gif
[Sat May 25 19:56:20 2013] Mean detx,y = (599.99, -5041.50) 
[Sat May 25 19:56:22 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum
[Sat May 25 19:56:37 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin
[Sat May 25 19:56:37 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90_src_b10.pi.gz
[Sat May 25 19:56:37 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90_bgd.pi.gz
[Sun May 26 02:04:45 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done
[Sun May 26 02:04:45 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts
[Sun May 26 16:38:20 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products
[Sun May 26 16:38:20 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90_src_b10.pi.gz = 1215.00
[Sun May 26 16:38:20 2013] Total counts from fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90_bgd.pi.gz = 0.00
[Sun May 26 16:38:20 2013] Got source and background scale factors 1020401.000000, 0.000000
[Sun May 26 16:38:20 2013] Background scale factor is not positive, halting re-assessment of this source
[Sun May 26 16:38:47 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00
[Sun May 26 16:38:47 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.037, arf fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90.arf
[Sun May 26 16:38:47 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass
[Sun May 26 16:38:47 2013] Updating source flux to 2.7e-13
[Sun May 26 16:41:56 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting
[Sun May 26 16:42:33 2013] xmm0111360201/analysis//spectral/fullrun_pn_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src90_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete