[Thu May 23 13:40:53 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (338.2, 401.8) = 17 2 32.98 -48 41 44.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 205.1 +/- 21.4 Background counts = 176.1 Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002 [Thu May 23 13:40:56 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 8.03' [Thu May 23 22:04:18 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Thu May 23 22:04:18 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.44" [Thu May 23 22:04:18 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.862 [Thu May 23 22:04:18 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 91 for pass 0, mean size = 10.44" [Fri May 24 05:50:08 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg exists [Fri May 24 05:50:08 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv [Fri May 24 05:50:08 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg exists [Fri May 24 05:50:08 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.csv [Fri May 24 05:50:08 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 24 05:50:12 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg exists [Fri May 24 05:50:12 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.csv [Fri May 24 05:50:12 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg exists [Fri May 24 05:50:12 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.csv [Fri May 24 05:50:12 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src91.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Fri May 24 14:02:27 2013] Warning, spatial fit 91 centroid is now closest to src. 57 [Fri May 24 14:02:27 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Fri May 24 14:02:27 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Fri May 24 14:02:27 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Fri May 24 14:02:27 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Fri May 24 14:02:27 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Fri May 24 14:02:27 2013] Source is confused with source 56 [Fri May 24 23:52:27 2013] Using EEF radius (= 10.44 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Fri May 24 23:52:27 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 10.44" [Fri May 24 23:52:27 2013] source mask rpix=2.4, npix_max = 33, mask sum = 29, frac = 0.862 [Fri May 24 23:52:27 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 88 for pass 1, mean size = 10.44" [Sat May 25 09:00:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88.ximg exists [Sat May 25 09:00:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88.csv [Sat May 25 09:00:45 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88_1.ximg exists [Sat May 25 09:00:45 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88.csv [Sat May 25 09:00:45 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat May 25 09:00:48 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88.ximg exists [Sat May 25 09:00:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88.csv [Sat May 25 09:00:48 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg exists [Sat May 25 09:00:48 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88.csv [Sat May 25 09:00:48 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src88.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sat May 25 17:23:28 2013] Source 61 is offset by -8.729936 and 2.870406 pixels which is larger than 2 X fitted extent = 1.256749 x 1.256749, not incorporating fit results [Sat May 25 17:23:28 2013] Warning, spatial fit 88 centroid is now closest to src. 56 [Sat May 25 17:23:29 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sat May 25 17:23:29 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sat May 25 17:23:29 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Sat May 25 17:23:29 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sat May 25 17:23:29 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun May 26 03:36:22 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(29376.297607, 34909.527344, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun May 26 03:36:22 2013] Writing source region out to fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src61_src.reg [Sun May 26 03:36:22 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (301, 364) - (376, 439) [Sun May 26 03:36:22 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(29376.297607, 34909.527344, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(32783.844000, 32667.958000, 3511.632101, 883.432025, 323.470400, X, Y) && !ellipse(28103.928200, 35015.636800, 1654.464048, 867.328025, 328.249700, X, Y) && !ellipse(28726.541400, 35191.852600, 1681.640048, 902.632026, 350.463240, X, Y) && !ellipse(33346.180600, 30771.490000, 2415.952070, 594.564017, 78.942100, X, Y) && !ellipse(28414.781403, 36048.742004, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29656.583740, 35361.575287, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26310.004000, 35369.002000, 1616.720047, 1095.400032, 135.155100, X, Y) && !ellipse(32955.308600, 33305.406000, 1709.760049, 706.774420, 77.540200, X, Y) && !ellipse(31033.203156, 35440.015472, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27649.344421, 35790.545715, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(27969.044464, 34656.771210, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(26702.871613, 34469.684570, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(29978.546000, 35465.624020, 1705.896049, 1705.896049, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(28965.917694, 34829.557861, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) [Sun May 26 03:36:22 2013] Writing fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src61.gif [Sun May 26 05:04:52 2013] Mean detx,y = (7014.46, 3637.23) [Sun May 26 05:04:54 2013] Setting backscal keywords in source and bgd. spectrum [Sun May 26 05:05:07 2013] Binned source spectrum to 10 counts/bin [Sun May 26 05:05:08 2013] Setting source spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src61_src_b10.pi.gz [Sun May 26 05:05:08 2013] Setting bgd. spectrum file to fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src61_bgd.pi.gz [Sun May 26 09:01:56 2013] Not generating rmf since RequireSpatial is true but spatial fitting not done [Sun May 26 09:01:56 2013] rmf not generated due to insufficient counts [Sun May 26 16:39:17 2013] Updating aperture counts using extracted products [Sun May 26 16:39:17 2013] Total counts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src61_src_b10.pi.gz = 2075.00 [Sun May 26 16:39:17 2013] Total counts from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src61_bgd.pi.gz = 166.00 [Sun May 26 16:39:17 2013] Got source and background scale factors 835372.000000, 96417.000000 [Sun May 26 16:39:17 2013] User source parameters: Position = (338.2, 401.8) = 17 2 32.98 -48 41 44.0 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 Source aperture counts = 636.7 +/- 46.6 Background aperture counts = 1438.3 Rate = 0.06 +/- 0.005 [Sun May 26 16:39:17 2013] Updating counts from extracted products [Sun May 26 16:39:17 2013] Set source signif. to 636.75/37.92 = 16.79 [Sun May 26 16:39:32 2013] Calculating source flux in energy range 0.30-8.00 [Sun May 26 16:39:32 2013] Using photon index=1.80, rate=0.0619, arf fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src61.arf [Sun May 26 16:39:32 2013] Assuming count rate is from the 0.30-10.00 bandpass [Sun May 26 16:39:32 2013] Updating source flux to 1.4e-12 [Sun May 26 16:40:19 2013] Simple spatial fitting not done (or not done successfully), skipping spectral fitting [Sun May 26 16:41:17 2013] xmm0111360201/analysis//spectral/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111360201_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src61_pl.csv not found, spectral fit skipped or did not complete