[Sun May 5 15:27:22 2013] Detection parameters: Position = (325.5, 211.5) = 11 18 20.17 40 17 56.8 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 38.2 +/- 8.3 Background counts = 8.4 Rate = 0.002 +/- 0.0004 [Sun May 5 15:27:22 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 6.60' [Sun May 5 15:27:39 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun May 5 15:27:39 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.73" [Sun May 5 15:27:39 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.701 [Sun May 5 15:27:39 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 18 for pass 0, mean size = 9.73" [Sun May 5 15:27:40 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg exists [Sun May 5 15:27:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv [Sun May 5 15:27:40 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg exists [Sun May 5 15:27:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.csv [Sun May 5 15:27:40 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 5 15:27:40 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg exists [Sun May 5 15:27:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv [Sun May 5 15:27:40 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg exists [Sun May 5 15:27:40 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.csv [Sun May 5 15:27:40 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src18.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 5 15:27:49 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 157.728000, observed total counts = 129.000000 [Sun May 5 15:27:49 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 25 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sun May 5 15:27:49 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun May 5 15:27:49 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun May 5 15:27:49 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Sun May 5 15:27:49 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sun May 5 15:27:49 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun May 5 15:27:59 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.73 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Sun May 5 15:27:59 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.73" [Sun May 5 15:27:59 2013] source mask rpix=2.2, npix_max = 29, mask sum = 21, frac = 0.701 [Sun May 5 15:27:59 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 1, mean size = 9.73" [Sun May 5 15:28:00 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg exists [Sun May 5 15:28:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv [Sun May 5 15:28:00 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg exists [Sun May 5 15:28:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.csv [Sun May 5 15:28:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 5 15:28:00 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists [Sun May 5 15:28:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv [Sun May 5 15:28:00 2013] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists [Sun May 5 15:28:00 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.csv [Sun May 5 15:28:00 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111290301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Sun May 5 15:28:09 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 161.688000, observed total counts = 129.000000 [Sun May 5 15:28:09 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 25 It may help to tweak spatial fit manually Not incorporating fit results [Sun May 5 15:28:09 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Sun May 5 15:28:09 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Sun May 5 15:28:09 2013] Assessing source extent using major [Sun May 5 15:28:09 2013] Source does appear to be extended [Sun May 5 15:28:09 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Sun May 5 15:28:09 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9