[Wed May 22 18:21:37 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (158.5, 293.4) = 21 16 46.70 -58 40 31.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 54.0 +/- 9.5
  Background counts = 12.3
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Wed May 22 18:21:37 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 10.15'
[Wed May 22 18:23:28 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 22 18:23:28 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.51"
[Wed May 22 18:23:28 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.657
[Wed May 22 18:23:28 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 0, mean size = 11.51"
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.csv
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 19:50:23 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 163.934000, observed total counts = 143.000000
[Wed May 22 19:50:23 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 9
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 22 19:50:23 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 22 19:50:23 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 22 19:50:23 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 22 19:50:23 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 22 19:50:23 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 22 19:50:34 2013] Using EEF radius (= 11.51 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 22 19:50:34 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 11.51"
[Wed May 22 19:50:34 2013] source mask rpix=2.6, npix_max = 39, mask sum = 26, frac = 0.657
[Wed May 22 19:50:34 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 9 for pass 1, mean size = 11.51"
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.csv
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.csv
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src9.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 20:59:24 2013] Warning: source 9 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 9 at 14.171506 pixels away
[Wed May 22 20:59:24 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 22 20:59:24 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 22 20:59:24 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 22 20:59:24 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 22 20:59:24 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 22 20:59:24 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9