[Wed May 22 18:21:37 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (321.9, 319.6) = 21 15 15.54 -58 38 43.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 63.7 +/- 11.1
  Background counts = 15.6
  Rate = 0.006 +/- 0.001

[Wed May 22 18:21:37 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.29'
[Wed May 22 18:23:28 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 22 18:23:28 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.57"
[Wed May 22 18:23:28 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.995
[Wed May 22 18:23:28 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 15 for pass 0, mean size = 7.57"
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.csv
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.csv
[Wed May 22 18:58:55 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src15.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 19:50:23 2013] Source 15 is offset by 6.881189 and 6.582239 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.870667 x 0.870667, not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 22 19:50:23 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 22 19:50:23 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 22 19:50:23 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 22 19:50:23 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 22 19:50:23 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 22 19:50:34 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.57 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Wed May 22 19:50:34 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.57"
[Wed May 22 19:50:34 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 20, frac = 0.995
[Wed May 22 19:50:34 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 13 for pass 1, mean size = 7.57"
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.csv
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg exists
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.csv
[Wed May 22 20:14:42 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111251501_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src13.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Wed May 22 20:59:24 2013] Warning: source 11 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 15 at 59.659755 pixels away
[Wed May 22 20:59:24 2013] Source 15 is offset by 6.881189 and 6.582239 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.870667 x 0.870667, not incorporating fit results
[Wed May 22 20:59:24 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Wed May 22 20:59:24 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Wed May 22 20:59:24 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Wed May 22 20:59:24 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Wed May 22 20:59:24 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Wed May 22 20:59:24 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 1.0