[Tue Jun 25 01:08:43 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (369.9, 490.6) = 20 39 54.51 -0 39 21.2
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 71.7 +/- 11.7
  Background counts = 9.2
  Rate = 0.004 +/- 0.0007

[Tue Jun 25 01:08:43 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.87'
[Tue Jun 25 02:38:13 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 02:38:13 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue Jun 25 02:38:13 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.86"
[Tue Jun 25 02:38:13 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 51, frac = 0.938
[Tue Jun 25 02:38:13 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 13.86"
[Tue Jun 25 02:58:51 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 02:58:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Tue Jun 25 02:58:51 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 02:58:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Tue Jun 25 02:58:51 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 02:58:51 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 02:58:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue Jun 25 02:58:51 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 02:58:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue Jun 25 02:58:51 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 02:59:06 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 179.267000, observed total counts = 151.000000
[Tue Jun 25 02:59:06 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 7
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 02:59:06 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 02:59:06 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 02:59:06 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 02:59:06 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 02:59:06 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 04:18:47 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.86 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Tue Jun 25 04:18:47 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Tue Jun 25 04:18:47 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.86"
[Tue Jun 25 04:18:47 2013] source mask rpix=3.2, npix_max = 54, mask sum = 51, frac = 0.938
[Tue Jun 25 04:18:47 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 13.86"
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:38 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:38 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:38 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:38 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:38 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:38 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:38 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:38 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:38 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:38 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0111180201_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:46 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 179.054000, observed total counts = 151.000000
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:46 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 7
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:46 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:46 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:46 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:46 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:46 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Tue Jun 25 04:35:46 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9