[Wed Jun 20 10:15:47 2012] Detection parameters: Position = (445.9, 194.6) = 2 24 31.36 -5 16 39.5 Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees Source counts = 28.3 +/- 7.8 Background counts = 7.3 Rate = 0.001 +/- 0.0003 [Wed Jun 20 10:15:47 2012] Off-axis axis estimate = 13.07' [Wed Jun 20 11:35:44 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Jun 20 11:35:44 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.97" [Wed Jun 20 11:35:44 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.011 [Wed Jun 20 11:35:44 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 0, mean size = 12.97" [Wed Jun 20 12:20:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111110301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28.ximg exists [Wed Jun 20 12:20:44 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111110301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 20 12:20:44 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0111110301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src28 appears to have run properly [Wed Jun 20 12:20:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111110301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists [Wed Jun 20 12:20:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111110301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv [Wed Jun 20 12:20:45 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111110301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 20 12:20:45 2012] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos1_xmm0111110301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.csv [Wed Jun 20 12:20:45 2012] It looks like the fit did not converge You should probably delete fullrun_mos1_xmm0111110301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos1_xmm0111110301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src28.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes [Wed Jun 20 12:56:36 2012] Warning: source 28 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 8 at 16.555583 pixels away [Wed Jun 20 12:56:36 2012] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000 [Wed Jun 20 12:56:36 2012] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 [Wed Jun 20 12:56:36 2012] Assessing source extent using major [Wed Jun 20 12:56:36 2012] Source does appear to be extended [Wed Jun 20 12:56:36 2012] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00 [Wed Jun 20 14:12:43 2012] Using EEF radius (= 12.97 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting [Wed Jun 20 14:12:43 2012] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 12.97" [Wed Jun 20 14:12:43 2012] source mask rpix=3.0, npix_max = 48, mask sum = 49, frac = 1.011 [Wed Jun 20 14:12:43 2012] Giving source the simple spatial ID 28 for pass 1, mean size = 12.97" [Wed Jun 20 14:51:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111110301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28.ximg exists [Wed Jun 20 14:51:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111110301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 20 14:51:59 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0111110301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src28 appears to have run properly [Wed Jun 20 14:51:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111110301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28.ximg exists [Wed Jun 20 14:51:59 2012] fullrun_mos1_xmm0111110301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28_1.ximg exists [Wed Jun 20 14:51:59 2012] Fit fullrun_mos1_xmm0111110301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src28 appears to have run properly [Wed Jun 20 15:24:43 2012] Spatial fit model total counts = 103.202000, observed total counts = 95.000000 [Wed Jun 20 15:24:43 2012] Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.446653 pixels [Wed Jun 20 15:24:43 2012] 102.986200 total counts/ 88.648300 bgd. counts: snr = 1.522826 Spatial fit parameters: Offset between fit and detection position for source 8 = 0.446653 pixels Position = (445.5, 194.6) = 2 24 31.49 -5 16 40.2 Extent = 4.4 (3.2-6.8)", rotation angle = 0 Source counts = 14.3 +/- 10.1 Background counts = 88.6 Rate = 0.0006 +/- 0.0004 Deleting source due to low Poisson probability