[Mon Jun 10 19:48:56 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (254.9, 359.8) = 15 3 51.33 -41 57 49.7
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 188.6 +/- 24.2
  Background counts = 280.2
  Rate = 0.02 +/- 0.002

[Mon Jun 10 19:49:03 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 5.46'
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:46 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.16 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:46 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.16"
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:46 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.700
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:46 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 85 for pass 0, mean size = 9.16"
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:49 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:51 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:51 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:51 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:51 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src85.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:29 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3806.120000, observed total counts = 2836.000000
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:29 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 91
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:29 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:29 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:29 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:29 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:29 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:29 2013] Source is confused with source 94
[Mon Jun 10 19:52:58 2013] Using EEF radius (= 9.16 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 10 19:52:58 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 9.16"
[Mon Jun 10 19:52:58 2013] source mask rpix=2.1, npix_max = 27, mask sum = 19, frac = 0.700
[Mon Jun 10 19:52:58 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 65 for pass 1, mean size = 9.16"
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:01 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:01 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:01 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src65.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:03 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:03 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:03 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:03 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src65.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:47 2013] Spatial fit model total counts = 3965.860000, observed total counts = 2836.000000
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:47 2013] Poor agreement between spatial fit and data for source 91
It may help to tweak spatial fit manually
Not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:47 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:47 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:47 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:47 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:47 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 10 19:55:07 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(22129.934113, 31257.433655, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jun 10 19:55:07 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src91_src.reg
[Mon Jun 10 19:55:07 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (217, 322) - (292, 397)
[Mon Jun 10 19:55:08 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(22129.934113, 31257.433655, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24565.504400, 32469.025400, 808.192023, 808.192023, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20086.129730, 31879.246826, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19551.900000, 32038.980200, 1584.544046, 1584.544046, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24295.708000, 31464.695000, 1391.176040, 1391.176040, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21530.064180, 31284.279600, 1144.256033, 1144.256033, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19259.487686, 31113.422211, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(24490.398000, 31422.816000, 1382.200040, 1382.200040, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22357.812622, 30516.736237, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19958.450699, 30584.930664, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19722.508865, 29298.945984, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(22441.621277, 29197.064545, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21743.922000, 29370.930800, 1386.904040, 1386.904040, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19958.203781, 28855.285278, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(23048.587524, 28273.791382, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jun 10 19:55:08 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src91.gif