[Mon Jun 10 19:48:53 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (233.9, 486.1) = 15 3 59.47 -41 48 45.4
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 577.8 +/- 35.1
  Background counts = 149.6
  Rate = 0.05 +/- 0.003

[Mon Jun 10 19:49:03 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 14.39'
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:46 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:46 2013] Setting initial spatial extent for simple fitting to maximum allowed for this pass
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:46 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.62"
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:46 2013] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 47, frac = 0.891
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:46 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 0, mean size = 13.62"
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:47 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:47 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:47 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:49 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:49 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:50:49 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:28 2013] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 19
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:28 2013] Source 6 is offset by -2.034650 and -1.880020 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 1.510547 x 1.510547, not incorporating fit results
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:29 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:29 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:29 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:29 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:29 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:29 2013] Source is confused with source 13
[Mon Jun 10 19:51:29 2013] Source is confused with source 280
[Mon Jun 10 19:52:58 2013] Using EEF radius (= 13.62 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Mon Jun 10 19:52:58 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 13.62"
[Mon Jun 10 19:52:58 2013] source mask rpix=3.1, npix_max = 52, mask sum = 47, frac = 0.891
[Mon Jun 10 19:52:58 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 5 for pass 1, mean size = 13.62"
[Mon Jun 10 19:52:59 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:52:59 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:52:59 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:52:59 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:52:59 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:02 2013] fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg exists
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:02 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.csv
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:02 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src5.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:46 2013] Warning, spatial fit 5 centroid is now closest to src. 13
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:47 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:47 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:47 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:47 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Mon Jun 10 19:53:47 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Mon Jun 10 19:55:02 2013] XMMSAS src. selection expression = ellipse(20301.257462, 42245.150269, 652.500000, 652.500000, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jun 10 19:55:02 2013] Not overwriting source region fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src6_src.reg
[Mon Jun 10 19:55:02 2013] Extracting stamp from image fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_cl_sm2.00.img.gz, (196, 449) - (271, 524)
[Mon Jun 10 19:55:02 2013] XMMSAS bgd. selection expression = annulus(20301.257462, 42245.150269, 1087.500000, 2175.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18644.493200, 38505.608000, 1999.584058, 742.284021, 292.947000, X, Y) && !ellipse(18936.419086, 39233.509801, 2038.320059, 959.659870, 113.798034, X, Y) && !ellipse(19176.734406, 40922.759827, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19323.933212, 40217.079590, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20590.379532, 42751.875885, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21754.386856, 41963.873810, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21075.615341, 41706.104980, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21550.548309, 41358.750153, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21034.735855, 41020.188782, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21225.264740, 39796.549500, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(20722.427414, 40504.640503, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21713.367981, 39451.151428, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(21191.430374, 39284.208496, 870.000000, 870.000000, 0.000000, X, Y) && !ellipse(19984.194000, 42540.590000, 2114.984061, 2114.984061, 0.000000, X, Y)
[Mon Jun 10 19:55:02 2013] Writing fullrun_pn_xmm0111090601_pi300-10000_pass1_cl_src6.gif