[Thu May 30 09:07:57 2013] Detection parameters:
  Position = (266.1, 302.0) = 15 2 38.60 -42 8 56.3
  Extent = 10.9" x 10.9", rotation angle = 0 degrees
  Source counts = 44.0 +/- 11.9
  Background counts = 31.3
  Rate = 0.01 +/- 0.003

[Thu May 30 09:08:00 2013] Off-axis axis estimate = 2.36'
[Thu May 30 09:09:09 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 30 09:09:09 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.61"
[Thu May 30 09:09:09 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.791
[Thu May 30 09:09:09 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 97 for pass 0, mean size = 7.61"
[Thu May 30 09:09:13 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src97.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src97.csv
[Thu May 30 09:09:14 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src97_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:14 2013] Warning: poor agreement between model and actual number of counts may be indicative of a poor fit in csv/fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src97.csv
[Thu May 30 09:09:14 2013] It looks like the fit did not converge
You should probably delete fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src97_1.ximg
Either tweak this fit manually starting from fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_src97.ximg or adjust the simplespatial fit parameters in $XASSIST/data/missions/*/*/spatial.dat and re-run simplespatial fitting after setting file recreation parameter to yes
[Thu May 30 09:09:17 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src97.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:17 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src97_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:09:18 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass0_tfrozen_src97 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Source 69 is offset by -1.174276 and -7.554883 pixels which is larger than
2 X fitted extent = 0.852837 x 0.852837, not incorporating fit results
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Warning: source 97 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 69 at 10.095000 pixels away
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 30 09:10:32 2013] Source is confused with source 80
[Thu May 30 09:11:12 2013] Using EEF radius (= 7.61 ")to estimate initial spatial extent for simple fitting
[Thu May 30 09:11:12 2013] Initial guess for spatial extent in simple fitting = 7.61"
[Thu May 30 09:11:12 2013] source mask rpix=1.7, npix_max = 20, mask sum = 16, frac = 0.791
[Thu May 30 09:11:12 2013] Giving source the simple spatial ID 70 for pass 1, mean size = 7.61"
[Thu May 30 09:11:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:11:16 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:11:16 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_src70 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 30 09:11:20 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:11:20 2013] fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70_1.ximg exists
[Thu May 30 09:11:20 2013] Fit fullrun_mos2_xmm0111090301_pi300-10000_cl_pass1_tfrozen_src70 appears to have run properly
[Thu May 30 09:12:25 2013] Warning: source 70 in spatial fitting list does not appear to have a counterpart in memory, closest src. was src. 69 at 10.166297 pixels away
[Thu May 30 09:12:25 2013] Vigneting correction estimate = 1.000000
[Thu May 30 09:12:25 2013] Source flux estimate in the 0.3-8.0 bandpass, Gamma=1.800000 = 0 
[Thu May 30 09:12:25 2013] Assessing source extent using major
[Thu May 30 09:12:25 2013] Source does appear to be extended
[Thu May 30 09:12:25 2013] Computing asymmetry using major and minor axis, asym = 1.00
[Thu May 30 09:12:25 2013] Deleting source due to low Poisson probability 0.9